Integrating Stochastic Geological Modeling and Injection–Production Optimization in Aquifer Underground Gas Storage: A Case Study of the Qianjiang Basin

Addressing the critical challenges of sealing integrity and operational optimization in aquifer gas storage (AGS), this study focuses on a block within the Qianjiang Basin to systematically investigate geological modeling and injection–production strategies. Utilizing 3D seismic interpretation, drilling, and logging data, a stochastic geological modeling approach was employed to construct a high-resolution 3D reservoir model, elucidating the distribution of reservoir properties and trap configurations. Numerical simulations optimized the gas storage parameters, yielding an injection rate of 160 MMSCF/day (40 MMSCF/well/day) over 6-month-long hot seasons and a production rate of 175 MMSCF/day during 5-month-long cold seasons. Interval theory was innovatively applied to assess fault stability under parameter uncertainty, determining a maximum safe operating pressure of 23.5 MPa—12.3% lower than conventional deterministic results. The non-probabilistic reliability analysis of caprock integrity showed a maximum 11.1% deviation from Monte Carlo simulations, validating the method’s robustness. These findings establish a quantitative framework for site selection, sealing system evaluation, and operational parameter design in AGS projects, offering critical insights to ensure safe and efficient gas storage operations. This work bridges theoretical modeling with practical engineering applications, providing actionable guidelines for large-scale AGS deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061728
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Stochastic Geological Modeling and Injection–Production Optimization in Aquifer Underground Gas Storage: A Case Study of the Qianjiang Basin

Beibei Yu, Chenyao Guo, Ruidong Wu, Zhongxin Ren et al.
1 citations
Processes
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
article

Integrating Stochastic Geological Modeling and Injection–Production Optimization in Aquifer Underground Gas Storage: A Case Study of the Qianjiang Basin

Beibei Yu, Chenyao Guo, Ruidong Wu, Zhongxin Ren, Liu Jiqin, Yueying Wang, Wei Chen, Yifan Xu, Yufeng Jiang, Zhixue Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Addressing the critical challenges of sealing integrity and operational optimization in aquifer gas storage (AGS), this study focuses on a block within the Qianjiang Basin to systematically investigate geological modeling and injection–production strategies. Utilizing 3D seismic interpretation, drilling, and logging data, a stochastic geological modeling approach was employed to construct a high-resolution 3D reservoir model, elucidating the distribution of reservoir properties and trap configurations. Numerical simulations optimized the gas storage parameters, yielding an injection rate of 160 MMSCF/day (40 MMSCF/well/day) over 6-month-long hot seasons and a production rate of 175 MMSCF/day during 5-month-long cold seasons. Interval theory was innovatively applied to assess fault stability under parameter uncertainty, determining a maximum safe operating pressure of 23.5 MPa—12.3% lower than conventional deterministic results. The non-probabilistic reliability analysis of caprock integrity showed a maximum 11.1% deviation from Monte Carlo simulations, validating the method’s robustness. These findings establish a quantitative framework for site selection, sealing system evaluation, and operational parameter design in AGS projects, offering critical insights to ensure safe and efficient gas storage operations. This work bridges theoretical modeling with practical engineering applications, providing actionable guidelines for large-scale AGS deployment.

ProcessesVol. 13(6)
China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.