Analisis Strategi Proyek Reparasi Kapal Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

The performance of ship repair projects at a shipyard company in East Java has not reached optimal levels, as evidenced by the inability to meet project completion targets. This study aims to analyze internal and external factors, formulate performance improvement strategies, and prioritize these strategies. The analysis identified 6 strengths, 6 weaknesses, 4 opportunities, and 6 threats. Based on SWOT analysis, 8 main strategies were identified. AHP analysis shows that the top priority strategy is implementing double cash. This is crucial as sudden additional work from the Owner Surveyor (OS) often disrupts planning and resource allocation. With double cash, the project team can efficiently handle additional tasks without disturbing the existing budget, address OS decision delays, and reduce disruptions to human resources and facilities, ensuring smooth operations and timely project completion. The second priority strategy is enhancing effective communication with OS to expedite decision-making and optimize resource allocation. The third priority is managing or evaluating customer payment terms to maintain stable cash flow, reduce financial risks, and avoid project delays.

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33863/mbmc.v3i1.3247
Primary Topic
Management and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Strategi Proyek Reparasi Kapal Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Management and Optimization Techniques
article

Analisis Strategi Proyek Reparasi Kapal Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

article en

Abstract

The performance of ship repair projects at a shipyard company in East Java has not reached optimal levels, as evidenced by the inability to meet project completion targets. This study aims to analyze internal and external factors, formulate performance improvement strategies, and prioritize these strategies. The analysis identified 6 strengths, 6 weaknesses, 4 opportunities, and 6 threats. Based on SWOT analysis, 8 main strategies were identified. AHP analysis shows that the top priority strategy is implementing double cash. This is crucial as sudden additional work from the Owner Surveyor (OS) often disrupts planning and resource allocation. With double cash, the project team can efficiently handle additional tasks without disturbing the existing budget, address OS decision delays, and reduce disruptions to human resources and facilities, ensuring smooth operations and timely project completion. The second priority strategy is enhancing effective communication with OS to expedite decision-making and optimize resource allocation. The third priority is managing or evaluating customer payment terms to maintain stable cash flow, reduce financial risks, and avoid project delays.

Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Management and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.