Capital Ideas: Modeling and Measuring Factors in the Knowledge Capital Model

ABSTRACT One of the main challenges when analyzing multinational firms (MNEs) is that this group is comprised of a rich variety of firms engaged in a spectrum of activity. In response to the separate models describing one type of MNE or another, the Knowledge Capital model was developed in order to provide a unified framework. Although this did yield many empirically supported insights, it nonetheless had difficulty explaining the co‐existence of FDI and trade among similar countries, an issue given that most FDI and trade takes place between such nations. While this can be resolved by adding in an additional factor—capital—this raises several questions on how best to match the expanded theory to the data. In this paper, we provide a discussion on the various ways this literature treats capital in both theory and empirics, illustrate some of the difficulties in mapping the models to data, and provide suggestions for future research including a need to model capital markets and taxation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70001
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capital Ideas: Modeling and Measuring Factors in the Knowledge Capital Model

Ronald B. Davies, James R. Markusen
Review of International Economics
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Capital Ideas: Modeling and Measuring Factors in the Knowledge Capital Model

Ronald B. Davies, James R. Markusen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the main challenges when analyzing multinational firms (MNEs) is that this group is comprised of a rich variety of firms engaged in a spectrum of activity. In response to the separate models describing one type of MNE or another, the Knowledge Capital model was developed in order to provide a unified framework. Although this did yield many empirically supported insights, it nonetheless had difficulty explaining the co‐existence of FDI and trade among similar countries, an issue given that most FDI and trade takes place between such nations. While this can be resolved by adding in an additional factor—capital—this raises several questions on how best to match the expanded theory to the data. In this paper, we provide a discussion on the various ways this literature treats capital in both theory and empirics, illustrate some of the difficulties in mapping the models to data, and provide suggestions for future research including a need to model capital markets and taxation.

Review of International EconomicsVol. 33(4)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.