Comparing Chemical Reaction Mechanisms for Jet Fuel in Turbulent Premixed Combustion Simulations

The compositions of alternative jet fuels can vary radically, and the consequences of these differences are a subject of ongoing investigation. Numerical combustion simulations are vital to this research and require chemical reaction mechanisms that efficiently and accurately capture the chemical pathways of combustion. Here, we present the recently developed Z79 collection of small pathway-centric reaction mechanisms for n-heptane, Jet A JP-5, and the two alternative jet fuels, C1 and C5. A novel ethanol mechanism, Z74 Ethanol, is also presented. All mechanisms are validated for laminar burning velocities and ignition delay times, capturing these key parameters for a range of initial gas temperatures and equivalence ratios. The mechanisms are also validated in large-eddy simulations (LESs) of a turbulent premixed bluff-body flame. In the LES, the new mechanisms for ethanol, n-heptane, and Jet A match available experimental data well, whereas the C1 mechanism slightly underpredicts the flame size. The flame size is correlated with the temperature ratio between reactants and products, and the temperature ratio trend in the LES is the same as in laminar flame simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j065162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Combustion and flame dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Chemical Reaction Mechanisms for Jet Fuel in Turbulent Premixed Combustion Simulations

Niklas Zettervall, Arvid Åkerblom, Christer Fureby
1 citations
AIAA Journal
Combustion and flame dynamics
1.33
article

Comparing Chemical Reaction Mechanisms for Jet Fuel in Turbulent Premixed Combustion Simulations

Niklas Zettervall, Arvid Åkerblom, Christer Fureby
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The compositions of alternative jet fuels can vary radically, and the consequences of these differences are a subject of ongoing investigation. Numerical combustion simulations are vital to this research and require chemical reaction mechanisms that efficiently and accurately capture the chemical pathways of combustion. Here, we present the recently developed Z79 collection of small pathway-centric reaction mechanisms for n-heptane, Jet A JP-5, and the two alternative jet fuels, C1 and C5. A novel ethanol mechanism, Z74 Ethanol, is also presented. All mechanisms are validated for laminar burning velocities and ignition delay times, capturing these key parameters for a range of initial gas temperatures and equivalence ratios. The mechanisms are also validated in large-eddy simulations (LESs) of a turbulent premixed bluff-body flame. In the LES, the new mechanisms for ethanol, n-heptane, and Jet A match available experimental data well, whereas the C1 mechanism slightly underpredicts the flame size. The flame size is correlated with the temperature ratio between reactants and products, and the temperature ratio trend in the LES is the same as in laminar flame simulations.

AIAA JournalVol. 63(9)
Swedish Defence Research Agency (SE), Lund University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet, Energimyndigheten, H2020 Societal Challenges
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Combustion and flame dynamics
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.