Unveiling multilayered barriers to agile methodologies: an exploratory study on relationships among barriers

Abstract Paper aims This study aims to explore the relationships between barriers to agile methodologies, focusing on identifying reinforcement mechanisms between these barriers and effective mitigation strategies. Originality This study contributes original insights by examining the interconnectedness of barriers to agile adoption and introducing reinforcement mechanisms as a novel concept. The findings add both theoretical depth and practical value to the existing literature on agile methodology implementation. Research method The research is based on qualitative evidence gathered from five projects. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, followed by in-depth content analysis of interviews using the N-VIVO® software. A coding schema was developed to systematically analyze the data and uncover key insights. Main findings The study identified four distinct reinforcement mechanisms that exacerbate the challenges of transitioning from traditional to agile methodologies. Additionally, the research highlights specific mitigation strategies that facilitate pattern recognition and suggest appropriate interventions for different stages of agile implementation. Implications for theory and practice The identification of reinforcement mechanisms and corresponding mitigation strategies provides practical guidance for organizations aiming to implement agile methodologies. This framework can help managers recognize patterns of resistance and apply targeted solutions during different phases of the agile transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20240096
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling multilayered barriers to agile methodologies: an exploratory study on relationships among barriers

Marco Cantamessa, Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, Kazushige Kobayashi
2 citations
Production
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
6.49
article

Unveiling multilayered barriers to agile methodologies: an exploratory study on relationships among barriers

Marco Cantamessa, Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, Kazushige Kobayashi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Paper aims This study aims to explore the relationships between barriers to agile methodologies, focusing on identifying reinforcement mechanisms between these barriers and effective mitigation strategies. Originality This study contributes original insights by examining the interconnectedness of barriers to agile adoption and introducing reinforcement mechanisms as a novel concept. The findings add both theoretical depth and practical value to the existing literature on agile methodology implementation. Research method The research is based on qualitative evidence gathered from five projects. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, followed by in-depth content analysis of interviews using the N-VIVO® software. A coding schema was developed to systematically analyze the data and uncover key insights. Main findings The study identified four distinct reinforcement mechanisms that exacerbate the challenges of transitioning from traditional to agile methodologies. Additionally, the research highlights specific mitigation strategies that facilitate pattern recognition and suggest appropriate interventions for different stages of agile implementation. Implications for theory and practice The identification of reinforcement mechanisms and corresponding mitigation strategies provides practical guidance for organizations aiming to implement agile methodologies. This framework can help managers recognize patterns of resistance and apply targeted solutions during different phases of the agile transition.

ProductionVol. 35
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.