Party Considerations for Renomination in Pre‐Electoral Coalitions

ABSTRACT Pre‐electoral coalitions are common across diverse political contexts. In this letter, I examine their impact on one of the most consequential functions of political parties: the candidate selection process. Focusing on Mexican state legislators, I analyze how pre‐electoral coalitions shape incumbent renomination decisions. I outline a multi‐stage process in which parties assess district characteristics, incumbent attributes, and the electoral competition. Using fixed‐effects penalized maximum likelihood logistic regression, I find that parties prioritize different factors at different stages. The results show that while vote share and candidate characteristics do not influence renomination decisions in coalition districts, they are crucial in determining whether a party retains nomination rights. In contrast, in non‐coalition districts, candidate characteristics play a key role in renomination decisions. These findings demonstrate how coalition dynamics can reshape parties' renomination strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70017
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Party Considerations for Renomination in Pre‐Electoral Coalitions

Lucia Motolinia
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Party Considerations for Renomination in Pre‐Electoral Coalitions

Lucia Motolinia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pre‐electoral coalitions are common across diverse political contexts. In this letter, I examine their impact on one of the most consequential functions of political parties: the candidate selection process. Focusing on Mexican state legislators, I analyze how pre‐electoral coalitions shape incumbent renomination decisions. I outline a multi‐stage process in which parties assess district characteristics, incumbent attributes, and the electoral competition. Using fixed‐effects penalized maximum likelihood logistic regression, I find that parties prioritize different factors at different stages. The results show that while vote share and candidate characteristics do not influence renomination decisions in coalition districts, they are crucial in determining whether a party retains nomination rights. In contrast, in non‐coalition districts, candidate characteristics play a key role in renomination decisions. These findings demonstrate how coalition dynamics can reshape parties' renomination strategies.

Legislative Studies QuarterlyVol. 50(4)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Party Considerations for Renomination in Pre‐Electoral Coalitions — Lucia Motolinia · Legislative Studies Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS