Borrowed adjectival inflection in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects

Abstract Many North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA) dialects have an inflectional paradigm (MSG -a, FSG -e, CPL -e) restricted to a particular set of adjectives. These are usually loans belonging to the semantic fields of bodily characteristics and colours. While most of the words taking the inflection across NENA are borrowed from Kurdish, there is strong evidence that the non-inherited inflection (FSG -e) is borrowed from Arabic. While the inflection is not, in Arabic, found on adjectives of the class denoting these semantic fields, a motivation for adopting it could be that it enables a distinction between the MSG and FSG forms that might otherwise be lost. The inflection could have originated in dialects in closer contact with Arabic, before spreading to other dialects and being applied to loans of other origins. A possible motivation as to why a loan inflection -e was used for FSG may be the preservation of the syllable structure of loans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Semitic Studies
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgae045
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Borrowed adjectival inflection in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects

Eleanor Coghill
Journal of Semitic Studies
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
article

Borrowed adjectival inflection in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects

Eleanor Coghill
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA) dialects have an inflectional paradigm (MSG -a, FSG -e, CPL -e) restricted to a particular set of adjectives. These are usually loans belonging to the semantic fields of bodily characteristics and colours. While most of the words taking the inflection across NENA are borrowed from Kurdish, there is strong evidence that the non-inherited inflection (FSG -e) is borrowed from Arabic. While the inflection is not, in Arabic, found on adjectives of the class denoting these semantic fields, a motivation for adopting it could be that it enables a distinction between the MSG and FSG forms that might otherwise be lost. The inflection could have originated in dialects in closer contact with Arabic, before spreading to other dialects and being applied to loans of other origins. A possible motivation as to why a loan inflection -e was used for FSG may be the preservation of the syllable structure of loans.

Journal of Semitic StudiesVol. 71(1)
Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Borrowed adjectival inflection in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects — Eleanor Coghill · Journal of Semitic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS