Starting right: Identifying material sustainability impacts for public sector organizations

Some local governments are voluntarily engaging in sustainability reporting to demonstrate their commitment to sustainable development. However, challenges like inconsistent interpretations of sustainability, organizational and power dynamics, resource limitations, and the lack of standardized frameworks hinder progress. This article highlights the importance of developing the materiality process in sustainability reporting, integrating organizational practices and accounting research. Materiality serves as both a strategic and organizational tool, influenced by institutional dynamics. Institutional logics, which guide and legitimize organizational practices, play a crucial role in shaping accountability and reporting processes, including the way materiality is defined and applied. The article seeks to contribute to the standardization of the definition of materiality in the public sector, particularly within local governments, aligning it with stakeholder needs to strengthen accountability and sustainability outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2507155
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Starting right: Identifying material sustainability impacts for public sector organizations

Laura Rocca, M Decastri, Davide Tonoli, Davide Giacomini
2 citations
Public Money & Management
Environmental Sustainability in Business
4.15
article

Starting right: Identifying material sustainability impacts for public sector organizations

Laura Rocca, M Decastri, Davide Tonoli, Davide Giacomini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Some local governments are voluntarily engaging in sustainability reporting to demonstrate their commitment to sustainable development. However, challenges like inconsistent interpretations of sustainability, organizational and power dynamics, resource limitations, and the lack of standardized frameworks hinder progress. This article highlights the importance of developing the materiality process in sustainability reporting, integrating organizational practices and accounting research. Materiality serves as both a strategic and organizational tool, influenced by institutional dynamics. Institutional logics, which guide and legitimize organizational practices, play a crucial role in shaping accountability and reporting processes, including the way materiality is defined and applied. The article seeks to contribute to the standardization of the definition of materiality in the public sector, particularly within local governments, aligning it with stakeholder needs to strengthen accountability and sustainability outcomes.

Public Money & ManagementVol. 46(3)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Brescia University (US), University of Brescia (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.