Using self-generated identification codes to match anonymous longitudinal data in a sexual health study of secondary school students: a cohort study

The use of SGICs successfully matched approximately 72.65% of the study sample over a one-year period. These findings highlight the potential of SGICs as a tool for longitudinal data matching while underscoring the need for further refinement of code generation processes and matching algorithms to minimize data wastage and improve effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03028-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using self-generated identification codes to match anonymous longitudinal data in a sexual health study of secondary school students: a cohort study

LM Ho, Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Kevin Wing Chung Lau, Alice Wai Chi Fung et al.
1 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
article

Using self-generated identification codes to match anonymous longitudinal data in a sexual health study of secondary school students: a cohort study

LM Ho, Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Kevin Wing Chung Lau, Alice Wai Chi Fung, Monique Yeung, JM Johnston, Ellie Bostwick Andres, Heidi Sze Lok Fan, Neda Hei Tung Ng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of SGICs successfully matched approximately 72.65% of the study sample over a one-year period. These findings highlight the potential of SGICs as a tool for longitudinal data matching while underscoring the need for further refinement of code generation processes and matching algorithms to minimize data wastage and improve effectiveness.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 25(1)
AIDS United (US), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Okanagan University College (CA), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Food and Health Bureau, Health and Medical Research Fund
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.