Scientific journals as narrative objects of the sciences

Using a referential framework that integrates the hermeneutic philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricœur, the critical theory of Herbert Marcuse and Jürgen Habermas, and the traditions of the history of the book and reading with the works of Roger Chartier and Martyn Lyons, among others, this essay aims to understand scientific journals as narrative objects of the sciences. These journals bring together communities that share common ways of interpreting the world and shape agreed-upon forms of narrating that common understanding. From this perspective, we propose to address the theoretical foundations of the category conversations of the sciences in the narrative dimension, disaggregated into four dimensions of analysis, that interlace the rationality present in the conversations that occur in the narrative dimension with the interests of their social environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320242911.17522023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific journals as narrative objects of the sciences

Viviana Martinovich
1 citations
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
3.25
article

Scientific journals as narrative objects of the sciences

Viviana Martinovich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using a referential framework that integrates the hermeneutic philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricœur, the critical theory of Herbert Marcuse and Jürgen Habermas, and the traditions of the history of the book and reading with the works of Roger Chartier and Martyn Lyons, among others, this essay aims to understand scientific journals as narrative objects of the sciences. These journals bring together communities that share common ways of interpreting the world and shape agreed-upon forms of narrating that common understanding. From this perspective, we propose to address the theoretical foundations of the category conversations of the sciences in the narrative dimension, disaggregated into four dimensions of analysis, that interlace the rationality present in the conversations that occur in the narrative dimension with the interests of their social environment.

Ciência & Saúde ColetivaVol. 30(suppl 1)
Universidad Nacional de Lanús (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.