Al-Māturīdī’s Divine Action Model

Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (d. 333/944) is the eponym of the Māturīdī tradition of kalām, one of the recognized theological schools of Sunnī Islam. This article proposes that whereas the classical Māturīdī tradition adopted an occasionalist divine action model (DAM), al-Māturīdī’s own works indicate a distinctive DAM that can best be described as concurrentist. It is grounded in his concept of God’s nature, particularly His attributes of existentiation (takwīn) and wisdom (ḥikma), and in an ontological theory by which he advocates a bundle theory of dispositional accidents to account for objects. We reconstruct the resultant DAM in detail, arguing that it is robust and avoids the objections of overdetermination and instability that typically plague other concurrentist models. We then explore its implications for key theological themes: the origin of the world, human free will, miracles, and modern science.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil20251615
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Al-Māturīdī’s Divine Action Model

David Solomon Jalajel, Ramon Harvey
Journal of Islamic Philosophy
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Al-Māturīdī’s Divine Action Model

David Solomon Jalajel, Ramon Harvey
article en

Abstract

Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (d. 333/944) is the eponym of the Māturīdī tradition of kalām, one of the recognized theological schools of Sunnī Islam. This article proposes that whereas the classical Māturīdī tradition adopted an occasionalist divine action model (DAM), al-Māturīdī’s own works indicate a distinctive DAM that can best be described as concurrentist. It is grounded in his concept of God’s nature, particularly His attributes of existentiation (takwīn) and wisdom (ḥikma), and in an ontological theory by which he advocates a bundle theory of dispositional accidents to account for objects. We reconstruct the resultant DAM in detail, arguing that it is robust and avoids the objections of overdetermination and instability that typically plague other concurrentist models. We then explore its implications for key theological themes: the origin of the world, human free will, miracles, and modern science.

Journal of Islamic PhilosophyVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.