Partisan cueing and preferences for fiscal integration in the European Union

Can political parties steer public preferences for highly contested issues? European integration has become increasingly politicised, forcing governments to heed constituents’ preferences during international negotiations. Existing research suggests that parties can cue their voters, but it remains unclear whether public opinion responds to partisan cues on contentious, real-world European policies that directly affect national autonomy. To study the effects of in- and out-party cues on public preferences, we conducted a pre-registered information treatment experiment in five countries utilising real-world treatments that avoid deception while limiting the problem of pre-treatment. Applied to the case of joint European debt, we find that political parties can shape public opinion on fiscal integration, as both in- and out-party cues affect preferences. While this study focuses on EU politics, it has important implications for research on attitudes towards international cooperation more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
West European Politics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2497720
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisan cueing and preferences for fiscal integration in the European Union

Björn Bremer, Francesco Nicoli, Theresa Kuhn, Maurits J. Meijers
1 citations
West European Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
article

Partisan cueing and preferences for fiscal integration in the European Union

Björn Bremer, Francesco Nicoli, Theresa Kuhn, Maurits J. Meijers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Can political parties steer public preferences for highly contested issues? European integration has become increasingly politicised, forcing governments to heed constituents’ preferences during international negotiations. Existing research suggests that parties can cue their voters, but it remains unclear whether public opinion responds to partisan cues on contentious, real-world European policies that directly affect national autonomy. To study the effects of in- and out-party cues on public preferences, we conducted a pre-registered information treatment experiment in five countries utilising real-world treatments that avoid deception while limiting the problem of pre-treatment. Applied to the case of joint European debt, we find that political parties can shape public opinion on fiscal integration, as both in- and out-party cues affect preferences. While this study focuses on EU politics, it has important implications for research on attitudes towards international cooperation more broadly.

West European Politics
Harvard University (US), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Central European University (AT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, European Commission, European University Institute, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universität Zürich, Universität Konstanz
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Partisan cueing and preferences for fiscal integration in the European Union — Björn Bremer, Francesco Nicoli, et al. · West European Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS