Beyond Good and Evil

The article is a review of selected passages from Steve Fuller’s recent book “To Justice and To Justify: Profiles of the Academic Vocation”. The main focus is on the epistemological aspects of Galileo Galilei’s scientific activity, whose counter-inductive methods of providing evidence for the heliocentric model of the world can, from a modern perspective, be regarded as typical scientific fraud. Various forms of scientific falsifications and unintentional cases of misinformation are analyzed through key historical examples, ranging from Gregor Mendel’s selection experiments and Robert Millikan’s oil-drop experiment to the scandals involving Hwang Woo-Suk and Hendrik Schon. The article explores the different motivations of scientists who engage in dishonest data manipulation. It raises the question of the possible ways and limits of legitimizing fraud actions in science.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Epistemology & Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562232
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Good and Evil

Daniil Yu. Turkenich
Epistemology & Philosophy of Science
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Beyond Good and Evil

Daniil Yu. Turkenich
article en

Abstract

The article is a review of selected passages from Steve Fuller’s recent book “To Justice and To Justify: Profiles of the Academic Vocation”. The main focus is on the epistemological aspects of Galileo Galilei’s scientific activity, whose counter-inductive methods of providing evidence for the heliocentric model of the world can, from a modern perspective, be regarded as typical scientific fraud. Various forms of scientific falsifications and unintentional cases of misinformation are analyzed through key historical examples, ranging from Gregor Mendel’s selection experiments and Robert Millikan’s oil-drop experiment to the scandals involving Hwang Woo-Suk and Hendrik Schon. The article explores the different motivations of scientists who engage in dishonest data manipulation. It raises the question of the possible ways and limits of legitimizing fraud actions in science.

Epistemology & Philosophy of ScienceVol. 62(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.