The Impossible Knowledge of the Heterogeneous

This paper examines Georges Bataille’s conceptualization of evil and excess through the framework of heterology, the “science of the heterogeneous.” Two key aims are addressed: first, to elucidate Bataille’s formulation of evil as a transgressive force that operates beyond conventional moral dichotomies, engaging with his notion of hypermorality and the intertwined nature of good and evil; second, to analyze excess as a fundamental principle of both economic and existential expenditure, highlighting its role in Bataille’s critique of utility, production, and self-preservation. By tracing Bataille’s engagement with figures such as Sade, Nietzsche, and Hegel, this paper points up the paradoxes inherent in his attempt to theorize the logically untenable—how excess and evil resist systematic representation and yet persist in human experience. Ultimately, the paper argues that Bataille’s thought embodies a strategic failure: an intentionally unresolved dialectic that exposes the limits of knowledge, language, and philosophical rigor when confronted with the radical otherness of the heterogeneous.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr2025528226
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impossible Knowledge of the Heterogeneous

Tung-Wei Ko
Journal of Philosophical Research
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

The Impossible Knowledge of the Heterogeneous

Tung-Wei Ko
article en

Abstract

This paper examines Georges Bataille’s conceptualization of evil and excess through the framework of heterology, the “science of the heterogeneous.” Two key aims are addressed: first, to elucidate Bataille’s formulation of evil as a transgressive force that operates beyond conventional moral dichotomies, engaging with his notion of hypermorality and the intertwined nature of good and evil; second, to analyze excess as a fundamental principle of both economic and existential expenditure, highlighting its role in Bataille’s critique of utility, production, and self-preservation. By tracing Bataille’s engagement with figures such as Sade, Nietzsche, and Hegel, this paper points up the paradoxes inherent in his attempt to theorize the logically untenable—how excess and evil resist systematic representation and yet persist in human experience. Ultimately, the paper argues that Bataille’s thought embodies a strategic failure: an intentionally unresolved dialectic that exposes the limits of knowledge, language, and philosophical rigor when confronted with the radical otherness of the heterogeneous.

Journal of Philosophical ResearchVol. 50
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.