Estimated Accuracy of the Simulation of the Precipitation Forming Snowpack in the Urals according to Global Numerical Weather Prediction Models and the ERA5 Reanalysis

The paper considers the spatiotemporal distribution of accumulated cold-season precipitation and the accuracy of its simulation according to the ICON and GFS/NCEP numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The forecasts of the NWP models were obtained with a daily lead time and aggregated to calculate monthly total precipitation. They were compared with the observational data from 189 weather stations, as well as with the ERA5 reanalysis data. The calculations were performed for the territory of the Urals and adjacent parts of European Russia and Western Siberia for the period from October 2019 to April 2024. It was found that the GFS/NCEP model in spring and ERA5 reanalysis during the entire cold season systematically overestimated the amount of precipitation. The root-mean-square error of the calculation of monthly total precipitation turned out to be the lowest for the ICON model data. Just these data can be recommended for calculating snow accumulation, although the ICON model underestimates the amount of precipitation for the heaviest snowfalls. The NWP models substantially overestimate precipitation for weather stations located in open areas, which may be caused by blowing-related underestimation of the measured precipitation amount. The average absolute forecast error for weather stations located in the Eastern Ural region is lower than for those in European Russia and the Urals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068373925030021
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated Accuracy of the Simulation of the Precipitation Forming Snowpack in the Urals according to Global Numerical Weather Prediction Models and the ERA5 Reanalysis

Andrey Shikhov, N. A. Kalinin
Russian Meteorology and Hydrology
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Estimated Accuracy of the Simulation of the Precipitation Forming Snowpack in the Urals according to Global Numerical Weather Prediction Models and the ERA5 Reanalysis

Andrey Shikhov, N. A. Kalinin
article en

Abstract

The paper considers the spatiotemporal distribution of accumulated cold-season precipitation and the accuracy of its simulation according to the ICON and GFS/NCEP numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The forecasts of the NWP models were obtained with a daily lead time and aggregated to calculate monthly total precipitation. They were compared with the observational data from 189 weather stations, as well as with the ERA5 reanalysis data. The calculations were performed for the territory of the Urals and adjacent parts of European Russia and Western Siberia for the period from October 2019 to April 2024. It was found that the GFS/NCEP model in spring and ERA5 reanalysis during the entire cold season systematically overestimated the amount of precipitation. The root-mean-square error of the calculation of monthly total precipitation turned out to be the lowest for the ICON model data. Just these data can be recommended for calculating snow accumulation, although the ICON model underestimates the amount of precipitation for the heaviest snowfalls. The NWP models substantially overestimate precipitation for weather stations located in open areas, which may be caused by blowing-related underestimation of the measured precipitation amount. The average absolute forecast error for weather stations located in the Eastern Ural region is lower than for those in European Russia and the Urals.

Russian Meteorology and HydrologyVol. 50(3)
Perm State University (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.