Neural Network-Based Composite Risk Scoring for Stratification of Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Patients in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Findings from South-West Oltenia

<b>Background</b>: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for more efficient and resource-conscious screening strategies. <b>Methods</b>: We screened 51,437 individuals (50-74 y) in South-West Oltenia, Romania, with FIT values of ≥20 µg Hb/g. Of the 2825 FIT-positive individuals, 1550 completed colonoscopy, and we recorded their age, sex, residence, education, comorbidities, medications, and FIT values. After imputing < 8% missing data via multiple imputation, we reduced dimensionality with an autoencoder (ReLU, dropout 0.5, L2, 100 epochs, batch 32) and applied K-Means clustering (k = 5). The following are examples of actionable clusters: Cluster 0 ("High-FIT malignant"): FIT > 200 µg/g, age > 65, diabetes; Cluster 2 ("Low-risk mixed"): FIT 100-199 µg/g, age < 60, no comorbidities; Cluster 3 ("Intermediate-risk older"): FIT 150-200 µg/g, ≥3 comorbidities, rural. Cluster labels were then predicted by a feed-forward neural network (64-32 neurons, dropout 0.6) and validated via 5-fold cross-validation plus a temporal hold-out. <b>Results</b>: Five distinct patient clusters were identified, enabling the development of a composite risk score. Notably, Cluster 0, characterized by elevated FIT levels, exhibited a malignancy rate of 50.91%, while the overall CRC diagnostic rate among colonoscoped patients was approximately 13.87%. This stratification model enhances the diagnostic yield by prioritizing high-risk patients for urgent colonoscopy and sparing low-risk individuals from unnecessary invasive procedures. <b>Conclusions</b>: The AI-driven composite risk score offers a refined framework for CRC risk stratification and optimized resource allocation. Its implementation can lead to earlier detection of advanced lesions, thereby improving patient outcomes. Further external validation on independent cohorts and regions is essential to confirm its broad utility, with potential future integration of additional biomarkers (e.g., genetic or omics-based indicators) to further enhance predictive accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111868
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Network-Based Composite Risk Scoring for Stratification of Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Patients in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Findings from South-West Oltenia

Irina-Paula Doica, Carmen-Nicoleta Oancea, D Rădulescu, Tudorel Ciurea et al.
1 citations
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Neural Network-Based Composite Risk Scoring for Stratification of Fecal Immunochemical Test-Positive Patients in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Findings from South-West Oltenia

Irina-Paula Doica, Carmen-Nicoleta Oancea, D Rădulescu, Tudorel Ciurea, Victor Mihai Sacerdoțianu, Dan Ionuț Gheonea, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Liliana Streba, Vlad Florin Iovănescu, Dan Nicolae Florescu, Alexandra-Georgiana Bocioagă
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for more efficient and resource-conscious screening strategies. <b>Methods</b>: We screened 51,437 individuals (50-74 y) in South-West Oltenia, Romania, with FIT values of ≥20 µg Hb/g. Of the 2825 FIT-positive individuals, 1550 completed colonoscopy, and we recorded their age, sex, residence, education, comorbidities, medications, and FIT values. After imputing < 8% missing data via multiple imputation, we reduced dimensionality with an autoencoder (ReLU, dropout 0.5, L2, 100 epochs, batch 32) and applied K-Means clustering (k = 5). The following are examples of actionable clusters: Cluster 0 ("High-FIT malignant"): FIT > 200 µg/g, age > 65, diabetes; Cluster 2 ("Low-risk mixed"): FIT 100-199 µg/g, age < 60, no comorbidities; Cluster 3 ("Intermediate-risk older"): FIT 150-200 µg/g, ≥3 comorbidities, rural. Cluster labels were then predicted by a feed-forward neural network (64-32 neurons, dropout 0.6) and validated via 5-fold cross-validation plus a temporal hold-out. <b>Results</b>: Five distinct patient clusters were identified, enabling the development of a composite risk score. Notably, Cluster 0, characterized by elevated FIT levels, exhibited a malignancy rate of 50.91%, while the overall CRC diagnostic rate among colonoscoped patients was approximately 13.87%. This stratification model enhances the diagnostic yield by prioritizing high-risk patients for urgent colonoscopy and sparing low-risk individuals from unnecessary invasive procedures. <b>Conclusions</b>: The AI-driven composite risk score offers a refined framework for CRC risk stratification and optimized resource allocation. Its implementation can lead to earlier detection of advanced lesions, thereby improving patient outcomes. Further external validation on independent cohorts and regions is essential to confirm its broad utility, with potential future integration of additional biomarkers (e.g., genetic or omics-based indicators) to further enhance predictive accuracy.

CancersVol. 17(11)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.