Revealing the Historical Peak Situation of CO2 Emissions from Buildings in the Great Bay Area

Understanding the historical peak situation and the rules for CO2 emissions from buildings helps to formulate reasonable building mitigation strategies, accelerating the achievement of the Chinese government’s carbon peak goal. As developed regions, cities in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Great Bay Area (GBA) provide valuable reference cases. This study quantified the historical building CO2 emissions of GBA cities and analyzed the contribution of driving factors using the Kaya identity and logarithmic mean Divisia index. Furthermore, we assessed the historical peak situation using the MK trend test method and discussed the reasons behind the inter-city difference in the peak situation shown by the environmental Kuznets curve. The results indicate that the building-related CO2 emissions of the GBA will slowly increase to 96.90 Mt CO2 by 2020 and that P&C buildings accounted for a larger proportion of emissions. Emission factors and population made the largest positive and negative contributions, respectively, to this total. At the city level, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong ranked as the top three sources of building CO2 emissions. Hong Kong peaked, Dongguan and Macao plateaued, and other cities maintained either slow or quick growth. CO2 emissions unit area, per capita building CO2 emissions, and building CO2 emissions reached a peak in that order. This study provides a valuable reference for formulating a city-level path showing building CO2 emissions peaks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111927
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing the Historical Peak Situation of CO2 Emissions from Buildings in the Great Bay Area

Kairui You, Yan Li, Xiao Wang
1 citations
Buildings
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Revealing the Historical Peak Situation of CO2 Emissions from Buildings in the Great Bay Area

Kairui You, Yan Li, Xiao Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding the historical peak situation and the rules for CO2 emissions from buildings helps to formulate reasonable building mitigation strategies, accelerating the achievement of the Chinese government’s carbon peak goal. As developed regions, cities in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Great Bay Area (GBA) provide valuable reference cases. This study quantified the historical building CO2 emissions of GBA cities and analyzed the contribution of driving factors using the Kaya identity and logarithmic mean Divisia index. Furthermore, we assessed the historical peak situation using the MK trend test method and discussed the reasons behind the inter-city difference in the peak situation shown by the environmental Kuznets curve. The results indicate that the building-related CO2 emissions of the GBA will slowly increase to 96.90 Mt CO2 by 2020 and that P&C buildings accounted for a larger proportion of emissions. Emission factors and population made the largest positive and negative contributions, respectively, to this total. At the city level, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong ranked as the top three sources of building CO2 emissions. Hong Kong peaked, Dongguan and Macao plateaued, and other cities maintained either slow or quick growth. CO2 emissions unit area, per capita building CO2 emissions, and building CO2 emissions reached a peak in that order. This study provides a valuable reference for formulating a city-level path showing building CO2 emissions peaks.

BuildingsVol. 15(11)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Chongqing University (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.