Linguistic ideologies, personae and practices in seventeenth-century France

Abstract New insights into the analysis of linguistic variation and change in the past are afforded through the lens of ideologies and personae. Woolard (1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory , 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press) argues that studies of attitudes, prestige, standards, etc. could profit from a rethinking within an explicitly social-theoretical frame of ideology analysis. In this article I outline how in seventeenth-century French metalinguistic writing the ideology of the standard, prescription and purism infuse the hierarchization of linguistic variants and the presentation of the qualities of what constitutes ‘good usage’. I next examine how the increasingly value-laden standard language creates linguistic insecurity in French speakers. The sociohistorical context at once shapes and reflects the dominant intersecting linguistic ideologies and thus the discussion of language in seventeenth-century French metalinguistic texts. In the ideological and sociohistorical context of seventeenth-century French society, a number of personae emerge who feature widely in courtesy books, literary discussions and metalinguistic texts, notably the honnête homme , the honnête femme , and the précieuse . These personae are at once created by literary and metalinguistic texts, and recognized and labelled by them as existing personae. Having demonstrated the benefits of using this approach for sociohistorical linguistics, the picture is then nuanced through consideration of the realities of both linguistic practices and the way they are described and analysed in metalinguistic texts. While, perhaps predictably, the linguistic reality is more complex than the ideologies which overlay it, the socio-theoretical framework of ideology analysis, when used sensitively, provides a fruitful lens for reading variation and change in the past.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2023-0044
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic ideologies, personae and practices in seventeenth-century France

Wendy Ayres‐Bennett
Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

Linguistic ideologies, personae and practices in seventeenth-century France

Wendy Ayres‐Bennett
article en

Abstract

Abstract New insights into the analysis of linguistic variation and change in the past are afforded through the lens of ideologies and personae. Woolard (1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory , 3–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press) argues that studies of attitudes, prestige, standards, etc. could profit from a rethinking within an explicitly social-theoretical frame of ideology analysis. In this article I outline how in seventeenth-century French metalinguistic writing the ideology of the standard, prescription and purism infuse the hierarchization of linguistic variants and the presentation of the qualities of what constitutes ‘good usage’. I next examine how the increasingly value-laden standard language creates linguistic insecurity in French speakers. The sociohistorical context at once shapes and reflects the dominant intersecting linguistic ideologies and thus the discussion of language in seventeenth-century French metalinguistic texts. In the ideological and sociohistorical context of seventeenth-century French society, a number of personae emerge who feature widely in courtesy books, literary discussions and metalinguistic texts, notably the honnête homme , the honnête femme , and the précieuse . These personae are at once created by literary and metalinguistic texts, and recognized and labelled by them as existing personae. Having demonstrated the benefits of using this approach for sociohistorical linguistics, the picture is then nuanced through consideration of the realities of both linguistic practices and the way they are described and analysed in metalinguistic texts. While, perhaps predictably, the linguistic reality is more complex than the ideologies which overlay it, the socio-theoretical framework of ideology analysis, when used sensitively, provides a fruitful lens for reading variation and change in the past.

Journal of Historical SociolinguisticsVol. 11(1)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linguistic ideologies, personae and practices in seventeenth-century France — Wendy Ayres‐Bennett · Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS