Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasinormal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks

Correspondences between apparently distant concepts are ubiquitous in theoretical physics. In the context of black holes (BHs), quasinormal modes (QNMs) were shown to be linked to both shadows, in the so-called eikonal limit, and graybody factors (GBFs), using the WKB approximation. We test the accuracy of the QNM-GBF correspondence in the context of the Hawking radiation for static and rotating black hole configurations, with particular attention to the superradiant regime. Our analysis reveals the correspondence failure to accurately reproduce the Hawking spectrum due to divergences. Furthermore, we bridge the gap between BH shadows and GBFs by drawing a correspondence between such quantities in the case of generic static and spherically symmetric spacetime configurations. The shadow-GBF correspondence is tested for some case studies, including regular BHs, and its limitations and applicability are discussed. This study opens new perspectives by introducing a new correspondence and remarking on the caution needed when considering these connections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/1q35-mjjz
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasinormal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks

Marco Calzà, Davide Pedrotti
15 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
28.05
article

Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasinormal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks

Marco Calzà, Davide Pedrotti
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Correspondences between apparently distant concepts are ubiquitous in theoretical physics. In the context of black holes (BHs), quasinormal modes (QNMs) were shown to be linked to both shadows, in the so-called eikonal limit, and graybody factors (GBFs), using the WKB approximation. We test the accuracy of the QNM-GBF correspondence in the context of the Hawking radiation for static and rotating black hole configurations, with particular attention to the superradiant regime. Our analysis reveals the correspondence failure to accurately reproduce the Hawking spectrum due to divergences. Furthermore, we bridge the gap between BH shadows and GBFs by drawing a correspondence between such quantities in the case of generic static and spherically symmetric spacetime configurations. The shadow-GBF correspondence is tested for some case studies, including regular BHs, and its limitations and applicability are discussed. This study opens new perspectives by introducing a new correspondence and remarking on the caution needed when considering these connections.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(12)
University of Trento (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics And Applications (IT), University of Sheffield (GB)
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Padova, European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Università degli Studi di Trento, Provincia Autonoma di Trento
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
28.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasinormal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks — Marco Calzà, Davide Pedrotti · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS