Decomposing Cloud Radiative Feedbacks by Cloud-Top Phase

Abstract Changes in cloud scattering properties and emissivity that arise from atmospheric warming cause substantial radiative feedbacks in model projections of anthropogenic climate change, and the relative importance of the underlying mechanisms is poorly understood. One leading hypothesis is that ice-to-liquid conversions cause clouds to optically thicken, producing a major negative feedback. We test this hypothesis by developing a method to decompose cloud radiative feedbacks by cloud-top phase. The method is applied to an ensemble of six state-of-the-art global climate models run with prescribed sea surface temperature. In these simulations, the global mean of the net cloud scattering and emissivity feedback from cloud-phase conversions ranges from −0.17 to −0.01 W m −2 K −1 , while the overall net cloud feedback ranges from 0.02 to 0.91 W m −2 K −1 . The multimodel mean of the cloud scattering and emissivity feedback from cloud-phase conversions is approximately 19% of the magnitude of the multimodel mean of the overall cloud feedback (−0.10 vs 0.52 W m −2 K −1 ). These results indicate that cloud-phase conversions cause a robust negative feedback by changing cloud scattering and emissivity, but this mechanism makes a modest contribution to the overall cloud feedback at the global scale. Significance Statement Climate warming changes Earth’s cloud properties, which then change the temperature further. One cloud-climate feedback mechanism involves the conversion of cloud ice particles to liquid droplets with warming. This makes clouds more opaque, causing them to reflect more solar radiation back to space. It is widely accepted that this mechanism dampens climate warming, but its importance relative to other feedback mechanisms has been unclear. This study develops a method to estimate the cloud opacity feedback from ice-to-liquid conversions in climate-model simulations. On average, cloud-opacity changes from phase conversions explain approximately 19% of the overall cloud–climate feedback in an ensemble of six climate models. This finding clarifies the importance of cloud-phase conversions in projections of anthropogenic climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-24-0538.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposing Cloud Radiative Feedbacks by Cloud-Top Phase

Brian Medeiros, Trude Storelvmo, Takuro Michibata, Ming Zhao et al.
1 citations
Journal of Climate
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
3.25
article

Decomposing Cloud Radiative Feedbacks by Cloud-Top Phase

Brian Medeiros, Trude Storelvmo, Takuro Michibata, Ming Zhao, Nicholas J. Lutsko, David Paynter, Brandon M. Duran, Margaret L. Duffy, Yi Qin, Po‐Lun Ma, Casey J. Wall, Matvey Debolskiy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Changes in cloud scattering properties and emissivity that arise from atmospheric warming cause substantial radiative feedbacks in model projections of anthropogenic climate change, and the relative importance of the underlying mechanisms is poorly understood. One leading hypothesis is that ice-to-liquid conversions cause clouds to optically thicken, producing a major negative feedback. We test this hypothesis by developing a method to decompose cloud radiative feedbacks by cloud-top phase. The method is applied to an ensemble of six state-of-the-art global climate models run with prescribed sea surface temperature. In these simulations, the global mean of the net cloud scattering and emissivity feedback from cloud-phase conversions ranges from −0.17 to −0.01 W m −2 K −1 , while the overall net cloud feedback ranges from 0.02 to 0.91 W m −2 K −1 . The multimodel mean of the cloud scattering and emissivity feedback from cloud-phase conversions is approximately 19% of the magnitude of the multimodel mean of the overall cloud feedback (−0.10 vs 0.52 W m −2 K −1 ). These results indicate that cloud-phase conversions cause a robust negative feedback by changing cloud scattering and emissivity, but this mechanism makes a modest contribution to the overall cloud feedback at the global scale. Significance Statement Climate warming changes Earth’s cloud properties, which then change the temperature further. One cloud-climate feedback mechanism involves the conversion of cloud ice particles to liquid droplets with warming. This makes clouds more opaque, causing them to reflect more solar radiation back to space. It is widely accepted that this mechanism dampens climate warming, but its importance relative to other feedback mechanisms has been unclear. This study develops a method to estimate the cloud opacity feedback from ice-to-liquid conversions in climate-model simulations. On average, cloud-opacity changes from phase conversions explain approximately 19% of the overall cloud–climate feedback in an ensemble of six climate models. This finding clarifies the importance of cloud-phase conversions in projections of anthropogenic climate change.

Journal of ClimateVol. 38(16)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), Kyushu University (JP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Stockholm University (SE), University of Oslo (NO), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Nord University (NO), University of California San Diego (US), Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.