Hagar Interprets Her Own Promise: Exploring A Hopeful Reading of Genesis 16:12

Genesis 16:12 contains three clauses that have been widely interpreted as predicting prolonged conflict between Ishmael’s descendants and their relatives within the Abrahamic family. While there is agreement among contemporary commentators that the wording of these clauses is ambiguous, negative renderings are far more prevalent than positive or neutral renderings in popular English translations, as well as in expositions of the text. This article argues that Hagar’s response to her own promise, in concert with other elements in the wider narrative of Genesis, should be prioritized in deciding between negative or positive interpretations of the ambiguous wording therein. It also reexamines the level of ambiguity of the wording itself to show that it may not be as obscure as has often been proposed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079251339742
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hagar Interprets Her Own Promise: Exploring A Hopeful Reading of Genesis 16:12

Michael A. Huffman
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Hagar Interprets Her Own Promise: Exploring A Hopeful Reading of Genesis 16:12

Michael A. Huffman
article en

Abstract

Genesis 16:12 contains three clauses that have been widely interpreted as predicting prolonged conflict between Ishmael’s descendants and their relatives within the Abrahamic family. While there is agreement among contemporary commentators that the wording of these clauses is ambiguous, negative renderings are far more prevalent than positive or neutral renderings in popular English translations, as well as in expositions of the text. This article argues that Hagar’s response to her own promise, in concert with other elements in the wider narrative of Genesis, should be prioritized in deciding between negative or positive interpretations of the ambiguous wording therein. It also reexamines the level of ambiguity of the wording itself to show that it may not be as obscure as has often been proposed.

Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and CultureVol. 55(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.