Multiple Professional Institutes’ Scene and Corporate Rescue Work-Related Professionalism

The study explored corporate rescue professionalism in a setting with multiple professional institutes. The study employed qualitative inquiry processes to gather and explore field data. Among others, interviews and document content analysis were employed to document the indicators of professionalism in multiple professional institutes’ scenes. The collected data were examined qualitatively, employing triangulation and thematic analysis and supplying complementary explanations to the developing results. The results show that work-related professionalism cannot be uniformly constructed in a setting with multiple professional institutes. Professionalism requires an occupation-specific learning and development regime. An exclusive selling proposition is hard to craft in a setting with multiple professional institutes and requires a qualification framework that values regulated practices in corporate laws and regulations. The short learning and development programmes are inconsistent with skills development laws calling for competency-based learning and development. Competency-based learning and development in the investigated case require higher educational programmes to be enrolled on the national qualifications framework administered by the relevant regulatory agency. The results’ practical implications suggest that the regulator will need to lead an occupation-specific qualification development process to permit corporate rescue practitioners to embrace a uniform socialisation structure with shared values that are needed to entrench occupational professionalism. The process will require documentation of regulated corporate rescue practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251339963
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Professional Institutes’ Scene and Corporate Rescue Work-Related Professionalism

Onesmus Ayaya
SAGE Open
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Multiple Professional Institutes’ Scene and Corporate Rescue Work-Related Professionalism

Onesmus Ayaya
article en

Abstract

The study explored corporate rescue professionalism in a setting with multiple professional institutes. The study employed qualitative inquiry processes to gather and explore field data. Among others, interviews and document content analysis were employed to document the indicators of professionalism in multiple professional institutes’ scenes. The collected data were examined qualitatively, employing triangulation and thematic analysis and supplying complementary explanations to the developing results. The results show that work-related professionalism cannot be uniformly constructed in a setting with multiple professional institutes. Professionalism requires an occupation-specific learning and development regime. An exclusive selling proposition is hard to craft in a setting with multiple professional institutes and requires a qualification framework that values regulated practices in corporate laws and regulations. The short learning and development programmes are inconsistent with skills development laws calling for competency-based learning and development. Competency-based learning and development in the investigated case require higher educational programmes to be enrolled on the national qualifications framework administered by the relevant regulatory agency. The results’ practical implications suggest that the regulator will need to lead an occupation-specific qualification development process to permit corporate rescue practitioners to embrace a uniform socialisation structure with shared values that are needed to entrench occupational professionalism. The process will require documentation of regulated corporate rescue practices.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(2)
University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.