Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I–<scp>IIIA</scp> breast cancer

Modifications to intended chemotherapy regimens may be due to various reasons and may impact patient outcomes. Understanding which factors are associated with chemotherapy modifications can help inform treatment planning and improve cancer care. We examined the association between patient/tumor factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy in women with Stages I-IIIA breast cancer who were treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Washington from 2005 to 2019. Modifications were defined as any dose reductions in the first cycle or throughout chemotherapy, regimen change, treatment delay (single delay >14 days) or receiving fewer cycles of any drugs than expected. We used generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function to calculate prevalence ratios (PRatios). Of 9700 women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, 34.6% had chemotherapy modifications. Selected results are shown: positive associations were observed with age (PRatio<sub>80+ vs. 18-39</sub>: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-2.50; p-trend <.001), body mass index (BMI) (PRatio<sub>≥35 vs. 18.5 to <25</sub>: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.41-1.65; p-trend <.001), and Charlson comorbidity index (PRatio<sub>3+ vs. 0</sub>: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.19-1.48; p-trend <.001), while more recent years of diagnosis were associated with decreased prevalence of treatment modifications (PRatio<sub>2015-2019 vs. 2005-2009</sub>: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.61-0.69; p-trend <.001). Stage was also positively associated (PRatio<sub>Stage IIIA vs. I</sub>: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.13-1.35; p-trend <.001), as was human epidermal growth factor-2 positive status (PRatio: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.89-2.10). In conclusion, patients with the highest likelihood of chemotherapy modifications represent those who may have more complex prescribing needs, including those of older age, higher BMI, and more comorbidity. Further understanding of how modifications could impact outcomes within these groups can inform and improve cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35494
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I–IIIA breast cancer

Elisa V. Bandera, Emily Valice, Jenna Bhimani, Kanichi G. Nakata et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
1.87
article

Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I–IIIA breast cancer

Elisa V. Bandera, Emily Valice, Jenna Bhimani, Kanichi G. Nakata, Isaac Joshua Ergas, Tatjana Kolevska, Kelli O’Connell, Raymond Liu, Lawrence H. Kushi, Grace Gallagher, Rachael Burganowski, Sara Tabatabai, Erin J. Aiello Bowles, Jennifer J. Griggs, Sonia Persaud, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Janise M. Roh, Narre Heon, Candyce H. Kroenke, Elizabeth D. Kantor, Victoria Blinder, Cecile A. Laurent, Peng Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Modifications to intended chemotherapy regimens may be due to various reasons and may impact patient outcomes. Understanding which factors are associated with chemotherapy modifications can help inform treatment planning and improve cancer care. We examined the association between patient/tumor factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy in women with Stages I-IIIA breast cancer who were treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Washington from 2005 to 2019. Modifications were defined as any dose reductions in the first cycle or throughout chemotherapy, regimen change, treatment delay (single delay >14 days) or receiving fewer cycles of any drugs than expected. We used generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function to calculate prevalence ratios (PRatios). Of 9700 women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, 34.6% had chemotherapy modifications. Selected results are shown: positive associations were observed with age (PRatio<sub>80+ vs. 18-39</sub>: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-2.50; p-trend <.001), body mass index (BMI) (PRatio<sub>≥35 vs. 18.5 to <25</sub>: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.41-1.65; p-trend <.001), and Charlson comorbidity index (PRatio<sub>3+ vs. 0</sub>: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.19-1.48; p-trend <.001), while more recent years of diagnosis were associated with decreased prevalence of treatment modifications (PRatio<sub>2015-2019 vs. 2005-2009</sub>: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.61-0.69; p-trend <.001). Stage was also positively associated (PRatio<sub>Stage IIIA vs. I</sub>: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.13-1.35; p-trend <.001), as was human epidermal growth factor-2 positive status (PRatio: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.89-2.10). In conclusion, patients with the highest likelihood of chemotherapy modifications represent those who may have more complex prescribing needs, including those of older age, higher BMI, and more comorbidity. Further understanding of how modifications could impact outcomes within these groups can inform and improve cancer care.

International Journal of CancerVol. 157(7)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), University of Michigan (US), Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center (US), Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (US), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US)
Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.