Inclusive participation in law-making: good governance or a constitutional obligation?

In this article, we discuss the right to participate in law-making processes from a constitutional law perspective. The study frames the inclusion of people affected by legislation in the legislative process as a legal obligation of public power. According to various better regulation guidelines, the involvement of affected people and the quality of a law-making procedure are traditionally considered good governance, rendering them subject to political consideration. However, we argue that beyond these guidelines, there is a constitutional mandate for inclusive participation rooted in generally accepted constitutional principles and human rights. The article provides insights into the constitutional basis of participation, offering a clearer understanding of regulatory frameworks and their implications for the inclusion of people affected by legislation. This work’s thesis understands and accounts for the nature of law-making as both a political and legal practice.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Theory and Practice of Legislation
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2025.2513176
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive participation in law-making: good governance or a constitutional obligation?

Hanna Hämäläinen, Janne Salminen
The Theory and Practice of Legislation
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Inclusive participation in law-making: good governance or a constitutional obligation?

Hanna Hämäläinen, Janne Salminen
article en

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the right to participate in law-making processes from a constitutional law perspective. The study frames the inclusion of people affected by legislation in the legislative process as a legal obligation of public power. According to various better regulation guidelines, the involvement of affected people and the quality of a law-making procedure are traditionally considered good governance, rendering them subject to political consideration. However, we argue that beyond these guidelines, there is a constitutional mandate for inclusive participation rooted in generally accepted constitutional principles and human rights. The article provides insights into the constitutional basis of participation, offering a clearer understanding of regulatory frameworks and their implications for the inclusion of people affected by legislation. This work’s thesis understands and accounts for the nature of law-making as both a political and legal practice.<br>

The Theory and Practice of LegislationVol. 13(2)
University of Turku (FI)
Academy of Finland, Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inclusive participation in law-making: good governance or a constitutional obligation? — Hanna Hämäläinen, Janne Salminen · The Theory and Practice of Legislation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS