Director Excess Compensation and Investment Efficiency: The Economic Role of Accounting

We examine the relation between director excess compensation and corporate investment efficiency, and the role of accounting quality in this association. We utilize a cost-minimization stochastic frontier approach to estimate director excess compensation. On average, over the 2007–2018 period, directors are paid approximately $59,455 more than their efficient compensation level. We find that overpaying directors aggravates agency problems and exacerbates overinvestment. Next, using an accounting quality index based on five accounting quality proxies pertaining to earnings management, value relevance, and asymmetric timely loss recognition, we document that accounting quality moderates the detrimental impact of director excess compensation on corporate investment. Our study adds to the literature on the negative effects of director excess compensation and the positive economic role of accounting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x251347700
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Director Excess Compensation and Investment Efficiency: The Economic Role of Accounting

Gerald J. Lobo, Bilal Al Dah, Mostafa Harakeh, Mustafa A. Dah
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Director Excess Compensation and Investment Efficiency: The Economic Role of Accounting

Gerald J. Lobo, Bilal Al Dah, Mostafa Harakeh, Mustafa A. Dah
article en

Abstract

We examine the relation between director excess compensation and corporate investment efficiency, and the role of accounting quality in this association. We utilize a cost-minimization stochastic frontier approach to estimate director excess compensation. On average, over the 2007–2018 period, directors are paid approximately $59,455 more than their efficient compensation level. We find that overpaying directors aggravates agency problems and exacerbates overinvestment. Next, using an accounting quality index based on five accounting quality proxies pertaining to earnings management, value relevance, and asymmetric timely loss recognition, we document that accounting quality moderates the detrimental impact of director excess compensation on corporate investment. Our study adds to the literature on the negative effects of director excess compensation and the positive economic role of accounting.

Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
University of Houston (US), Kean University (US), Lebanese American University (LB), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Director Excess Compensation and Investment Efficiency: The Economic Role of Accounting — Gerald J. Lobo, Bilal Al Dah, et al. · Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS