Interpersonal sensemaking and cooperation in investigative interviews: The role of motivational matching

The cylinder model of interpersonal sensemaking predicts that cooperation emerges in interactions where speakers are matched on motivational frames and cooperative rather than competitive in orientation. The purpose of the current study was to provide the first evidence of a causal link between motivational frame matching and cooperation and trust in an investigative interviewing context. Over two pre-registered experiments (<i>N</i> = 776), participants took the role of a suspect during an interaction with an interviewer. During the interaction, the interviewer and suspect either matched motivational frames (in an instrumental, relational or identity motivational frame) or not, in either a cooperative or competitive way. It was found that within a cooperative orientation interaction, motivational frame matching led to significantly higher willingness to cooperate and greater feelings of being understood among the participants. In contrast, within a competitive orientation interaction, motivational frame matching led to significantly less willingness to cooperate and identify with the interviewer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251348932
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpersonal sensemaking and cooperation in investigative interviews: The role of motivational matching

Stacey M. Conchie, Paul Taylor, Mattias Sjöberg
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Interpersonal sensemaking and cooperation in investigative interviews: The role of motivational matching

Stacey M. Conchie, Paul Taylor, Mattias Sjöberg
article en

Abstract

The cylinder model of interpersonal sensemaking predicts that cooperation emerges in interactions where speakers are matched on motivational frames and cooperative rather than competitive in orientation. The purpose of the current study was to provide the first evidence of a causal link between motivational frame matching and cooperation and trust in an investigative interviewing context. Over two pre-registered experiments (<i>N</i> = 776), participants took the role of a suspect during an interaction with an interviewer. During the interaction, the interviewer and suspect either matched motivational frames (in an instrumental, relational or identity motivational frame) or not, in either a cooperative or competitive way. It was found that within a cooperative orientation interaction, motivational frame matching led to significantly higher willingness to cooperate and greater feelings of being understood among the participants. In contrast, within a competitive orientation interaction, motivational frame matching led to significantly less willingness to cooperate and identify with the interviewer.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(2)
Durham University (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpersonal sensemaking and cooperation in investigative interviews: The role of motivational matching — Stacey M. Conchie, Paul Taylor, et al. · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS