Optimization of passive superconductors for shaping stellarator magnetic fields

We consider the problem of optimizing a set of passive superconducting coils (PSCs) with currents induced by a background magnetic field rather than power supplies. In the nuclear fusion literature, such coils have been proposed to partially produce the 3D magnetic fields for stellarators and provide passive stabilization. We perform the first optimizations of PSC arrays with respect to the orientation, shape, and location of each coil, jointly minimized with the background fields. We conclude by generating passive coil array solutions for four stellarators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.111.065202
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of passive superconductors for shaping stellarator magnetic fields

M. C. Zarnstorff, Matt Landreman, Alan A. Kaptanoglu
1 citations
Physical review. E
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
article

Optimization of passive superconductors for shaping stellarator magnetic fields

M. C. Zarnstorff, Matt Landreman, Alan A. Kaptanoglu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We consider the problem of optimizing a set of passive superconducting coils (PSCs) with currents induced by a background magnetic field rather than power supplies. In the nuclear fusion literature, such coils have been proposed to partially produce the 3D magnetic fields for stellarators and provide passive stabilization. We perform the first optimizations of PSC arrays with respect to the orientation, shape, and location of each coil, jointly minimized with the background fields. We conclude by generating passive coil array solutions for four stellarators.

Physical review. EVol. 111(6)
University of Washington (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US), Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Simons Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.