Perception of the activities and image of Ismail Gasprinsky by the Tatar intelligentsia of the early 20th century

The activities of Ismail Gasprinsky including his ideas and practical steps (publication of the Tarjuman newspaper, the beginning of the Muslim school system reorganization) aimed at reforming the education system was a completely new phenomenon in the Turkic-Tatar community. The public reaction to his plans for large-scale reforms was mixed. At first, society treated them with great caution. However, the positive results demonstrated by the shakirds of the new method madrassas and mektebes gradually changed the attitude of society towards the new method and more and more supporters began to think about introducing a new approach to teaching children. The mugallims of Tatar madrassas, who had extensive experience in teaching children using traditional methods, began to look closely at the new educational approach of Ysuly Sautiya. The transition to a new sound method of teaching in Tatar society happened quite quickly and painlessly, the benefits were obvious even to those who doubted it. However, some of Gasprinsky’s ideas, for example, about the common Turkic language, did not find support and approval in Tatar society. The purpose of the publication is to reveal the perception by the Tatar intelligentsia of I. Gasprinsky’s practical activities, ideas and plans at the beginning of the 20th century. The sources for the study were materials from the Tatar periodical press of the early 20th century, individual articles and memoirs of two representatives of the Tatar intelligentsia R. Fakhrutdin and G. Iskhaki. The used materials are written in the Old Tatar language in Arabic script. Therefore, they are inaccessible to a wide range of readers. This study expands the possibilities for reconstructing intellectual discussions in the Turkic-Tatar society of the early 20th century related to the personality of I. Gasprinsky.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Ethnology
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22378/he.2025-10-2.292-301
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of the activities and image of Ismail Gasprinsky by the Tatar intelligentsia of the early 20th century

Elmira K. Salakhova
Historical Ethnology
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

Perception of the activities and image of Ismail Gasprinsky by the Tatar intelligentsia of the early 20th century

Elmira K. Salakhova
article en

Abstract

The activities of Ismail Gasprinsky including his ideas and practical steps (publication of the Tarjuman newspaper, the beginning of the Muslim school system reorganization) aimed at reforming the education system was a completely new phenomenon in the Turkic-Tatar community. The public reaction to his plans for large-scale reforms was mixed. At first, society treated them with great caution. However, the positive results demonstrated by the shakirds of the new method madrassas and mektebes gradually changed the attitude of society towards the new method and more and more supporters began to think about introducing a new approach to teaching children. The mugallims of Tatar madrassas, who had extensive experience in teaching children using traditional methods, began to look closely at the new educational approach of Ysuly Sautiya. The transition to a new sound method of teaching in Tatar society happened quite quickly and painlessly, the benefits were obvious even to those who doubted it. However, some of Gasprinsky’s ideas, for example, about the common Turkic language, did not find support and approval in Tatar society. The purpose of the publication is to reveal the perception by the Tatar intelligentsia of I. Gasprinsky’s practical activities, ideas and plans at the beginning of the 20th century. The sources for the study were materials from the Tatar periodical press of the early 20th century, individual articles and memoirs of two representatives of the Tatar intelligentsia R. Fakhrutdin and G. Iskhaki. The used materials are written in the Old Tatar language in Arabic script. Therefore, they are inaccessible to a wide range of readers. This study expands the possibilities for reconstructing intellectual discussions in the Turkic-Tatar society of the early 20th century related to the personality of I. Gasprinsky.

Historical EthnologyVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perception of the activities and image of Ismail Gasprinsky by the Tatar intelligentsia of the early 20th century — Elmira K. Salakhova · Historical Ethnology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS