Theorizing populism in international relations: a classical realist perspective

This paper explores the theoretical challenges posed by the rise of populism for IR, employing a classical realist framework. While there is a rapidly growing literature on populism, IR has so far shunned its own theories to analyse populism. Drawing on Hans Morgenthau, we argue that his concept of the political can provide important insights to formulate a normative critique of the political potential and dangers inherent in populism. Informed by an effort to recognise the centrality of power and antagonism in politics, Morgenthau postulated that openness and indeterminacy are the very essence of politics that must be defended. Against this backdrop, we discuss how populism is a reaction to a depoliticisation processes, ranging from technologisation and scientification to the hegemonisation of neoliberal ideology, and evaluate to what extent populism is suitable for re-politicising politics and preserving it as an open and critical space of public political debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2025.2514156
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorizing populism in international relations: a classical realist perspective

Felix Rösch, Thorsten Wojczewski
3 citations
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
International Relations and Foreign Policy
25.57
article

Theorizing populism in international relations: a classical realist perspective

Felix Rösch, Thorsten Wojczewski
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the theoretical challenges posed by the rise of populism for IR, employing a classical realist framework. While there is a rapidly growing literature on populism, IR has so far shunned its own theories to analyse populism. Drawing on Hans Morgenthau, we argue that his concept of the political can provide important insights to formulate a normative critique of the political potential and dangers inherent in populism. Informed by an effort to recognise the centrality of power and antagonism in politics, Morgenthau postulated that openness and indeterminacy are the very essence of politics that must be defended. Against this backdrop, we discuss how populism is a reaction to a depoliticisation processes, ranging from technologisation and scientification to the hegemonisation of neoliberal ideology, and evaluate to what extent populism is suitable for re-politicising politics and preserving it as an open and critical space of public political debate.

Cambridge Review of International AffairsVol. 38(4)
University of Sussex (GB), Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theorizing populism in international relations: a classical realist perspective — Felix Rösch, Thorsten Wojczewski · Cambridge Review of International Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS