Assessing the Viability of Segmental Aneuploid Embryos: A Chromosomal Concordance Study of 175 Human Blastocysts

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used to select euploid embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its accuracy in predicting the implantation potential for full segmental aneuploid (Seg-A) embryos remains unclear. In this study, we investigated chromosomal concordance between clinically biopsied trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) in 175 donated blastocysts, which comprised those clinically diagnosed as euploid (13), Seg-A (36), segmental mosaicism (Seg-M) (60), whole-chromosome aneuploid (Who-A) (52), and whole-chromosome mosaicism (14). Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we found that TE-ICM concordance rates were higher for euploid (85%) and Who-A (94%) embryos but significantly lower for Seg-A (25%) and Seg-M embryos (33%). For Seg-A, the euploidy rate in the ICM was 19% and the euploidy rate in the ICM was 63% for Seg-M. These low concordance rates may be due to technical and biological artifacts of PGT-A for Seg-A. Despite the significant discordance between TE and ICM, a subset of Seg-A embryos demonstrated euploidy. While clinically diagnosed euploid embryos remain the preferred choice, Seg-A embryos should be considered as having implantation potential. In particular, Seg-A results should be clearly distinguished from Who-A results and not routinely categorically discarded. Further research is required to refine the selection criteria, aided by parental karyotyping or re-biopsy, and to develop more reliable embryo assessment methods to ensure the accurate evaluation of reproductive potential and support shared decision making between doctors and patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115284
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Viability of Segmental Aneuploid Embryos: A Chromosomal Concordance Study of 175 Human Blastocysts

En‐Hui Cheng, Pin‐Yao Lin, Maw‐Sheng Lee, Tzu-Ning Yu et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
6.99
article

Assessing the Viability of Segmental Aneuploid Embryos: A Chromosomal Concordance Study of 175 Human Blastocysts

En‐Hui Cheng, Pin‐Yao Lin, Maw‐Sheng Lee, Tzu-Ning Yu, Hui-Hsin Shih, Tsung‐Hsien Lee, Chun‐Chia Huang, Chun-I Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used to select euploid embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its accuracy in predicting the implantation potential for full segmental aneuploid (Seg-A) embryos remains unclear. In this study, we investigated chromosomal concordance between clinically biopsied trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) in 175 donated blastocysts, which comprised those clinically diagnosed as euploid (13), Seg-A (36), segmental mosaicism (Seg-M) (60), whole-chromosome aneuploid (Who-A) (52), and whole-chromosome mosaicism (14). Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we found that TE-ICM concordance rates were higher for euploid (85%) and Who-A (94%) embryos but significantly lower for Seg-A (25%) and Seg-M embryos (33%). For Seg-A, the euploidy rate in the ICM was 19% and the euploidy rate in the ICM was 63% for Seg-M. These low concordance rates may be due to technical and biological artifacts of PGT-A for Seg-A. Despite the significant discordance between TE and ICM, a subset of Seg-A embryos demonstrated euploidy. While clinically diagnosed euploid embryos remain the preferred choice, Seg-A embryos should be considered as having implantation potential. In particular, Seg-A results should be clearly distinguished from Who-A results and not routinely categorically discarded. Further research is required to refine the selection criteria, aided by parental karyotyping or re-biopsy, and to develop more reliable embryo assessment methods to ensure the accurate evaluation of reproductive potential and support shared decision making between doctors and patients.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(11)
National Chung Hsing University (TW), Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (TW), Chung Shan Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.