Spatialising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps

Spatial assessments of the ecological impacts of alien species are needed to integrate impacts into biodiversity conservation policies and management strategies. We developed standardised approaches for aggregating impact scores at both species and site levels, synthesising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps. We applied these approaches to 33 Australian Acacia species introduced in South Africa. Creating risk maps involves four main steps: (1) perform impact assessment per species; (2) combine impact categories into one score per species; (3) gather species occurrence data into standardised grid cells; and (4) combine impact scores across species per grid cell into a risk map. We proposed six risk maps based on different assumptions of impact aggregation. All risk maps revealed important variation in environmental impacts of alien Acacia species across South Africa. The only exception was the precautionary risk map, which indicated that nearly all the areas occupied by Acacia had high risk, whereas the other risk maps identified between 5% and 14% with high risk. Risk maps provide additional information compared to maps of alien species richness and can help identifying areas where greater ecological impacts are likely. The approaches for risk maps can be applied to any taxon with available data on their distribution and ecological impacts. Our approach can be used to identify and prioritise sites with potential high impact. Based on the future risk map, we suggest five management strategies to limit the expansion of impactful species, of for clearing impactful species. • We showcase novel approaches to quantify risk maps of alien species • For the first time, we outline six options for aggregating ecological impacts • High impact areas for Acacia species in South Africa vary depending on the approach • Risk maps can be used as indicators to track the extent of impacts of alien species • Our approaches can be applied to any taxon with distribution and impact data

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03660
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatialising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps

Antoine Becker‐Scarpitta, Sabrina Kumschick, Mathieu Rouget, Christophe Botella et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Spatialising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps

Antoine Becker‐Scarpitta, Sabrina Kumschick, Mathieu Rouget, Christophe Botella, Océane Boulesnane-Guengant
article en

Abstract

Spatial assessments of the ecological impacts of alien species are needed to integrate impacts into biodiversity conservation policies and management strategies. We developed standardised approaches for aggregating impact scores at both species and site levels, synthesising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps. We applied these approaches to 33 Australian Acacia species introduced in South Africa. Creating risk maps involves four main steps: (1) perform impact assessment per species; (2) combine impact categories into one score per species; (3) gather species occurrence data into standardised grid cells; and (4) combine impact scores across species per grid cell into a risk map. We proposed six risk maps based on different assumptions of impact aggregation. All risk maps revealed important variation in environmental impacts of alien Acacia species across South Africa. The only exception was the precautionary risk map, which indicated that nearly all the areas occupied by Acacia had high risk, whereas the other risk maps identified between 5% and 14% with high risk. Risk maps provide additional information compared to maps of alien species richness and can help identifying areas where greater ecological impacts are likely. The approaches for risk maps can be applied to any taxon with available data on their distribution and ecological impacts. Our approach can be used to identify and prioritise sites with potential high impact. Based on the future risk map, we suggest five management strategies to limit the expansion of impactful species, of for clearing impactful species. • We showcase novel approaches to quantify risk maps of alien species • For the first time, we outline six options for aggregating ecological impacts • High impact areas for Acacia species in South Africa vary depending on the approach • Risk maps can be used as indicators to track the extent of impacts of alien species • Our approaches can be applied to any taxon with distribution and impact data

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 61
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Stellenbosch University (ZA), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (FR), Peuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical (RE)
European Commission, Universiteit Stellenbosch, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, FP7 International Cooperation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.