A cost-effectiveness analysis of two psychological treatments for controlled drinking in individuals with alcohol use disorder

In Sweden, up to 7% of people exhibit harmful alcohol use or dependency, but only a small fraction (10–20%) pursue treatment. While Behavioral Self-Control Training (BSCT) and Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) are effective for alcohol use disorders (AUD), their cost-effectiveness has not been studied. This research evaluates the cost-effectiveness of BSCT and MET in treating AUD, focusing on achieving controlled drinking from both a healthcare and limited societal perspective. A Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of BSCT and MET for treatment-seeking individuals with AUD. This model simulated a sample of patients with AUD over five years, calculating the costs and outcomes for both treatments. It used a cost-utility analysis to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The model accounted for varying levels of alcohol intake and related health complications. Efficacy data came from a randomized trial, with complication risks, costs, utilities, and mortality rates drawn from existing literature. BSCT, consisting of five sessions, was compared to MET, constituted by four sessions. The primary outcome was cost per QALY. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate how parameter uncertainty affected model outputs. BSCT proved less costly than MET, yielding savings in healthcare costs by $50.52 and societal costs by $118.12 on average per person. Additionally, BSCT demonstrated an advantage in QALYs, with a gain of 0.060 QALYs per patient over MET. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results, indicating that BSCT is the cost-effective treatment option. In comparison to MET, BSCT is less costly and more beneficial for health, indicating its potential as a valuable treatment option for individuals with AUD targeting controlled drinking. The model can be applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of various other AUD treatment interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00633-9
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of two psychological treatments for controlled drinking in individuals with alcohol use disorder

Filipa Maria Soares de Sampaio, Egill Jónsson‐Bachmann, Stina Ingesson, Anders Hammarberg et al.
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of two psychological treatments for controlled drinking in individuals with alcohol use disorder

Filipa Maria Soares de Sampaio, Egill Jónsson‐Bachmann, Stina Ingesson, Anders Hammarberg, Sergio Flores, Camilla Nystrand
article en

Abstract

In Sweden, up to 7% of people exhibit harmful alcohol use or dependency, but only a small fraction (10–20%) pursue treatment. While Behavioral Self-Control Training (BSCT) and Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) are effective for alcohol use disorders (AUD), their cost-effectiveness has not been studied. This research evaluates the cost-effectiveness of BSCT and MET in treating AUD, focusing on achieving controlled drinking from both a healthcare and limited societal perspective. A Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of BSCT and MET for treatment-seeking individuals with AUD. This model simulated a sample of patients with AUD over five years, calculating the costs and outcomes for both treatments. It used a cost-utility analysis to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The model accounted for varying levels of alcohol intake and related health complications. Efficacy data came from a randomized trial, with complication risks, costs, utilities, and mortality rates drawn from existing literature. BSCT, consisting of five sessions, was compared to MET, constituted by four sessions. The primary outcome was cost per QALY. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate how parameter uncertainty affected model outputs. BSCT proved less costly than MET, yielding savings in healthcare costs by $50.52 and societal costs by $118.12 on average per person. Additionally, BSCT demonstrated an advantage in QALYs, with a gain of 0.060 QALYs per patient over MET. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results, indicating that BSCT is the cost-effective treatment option. In comparison to MET, BSCT is less costly and more beneficial for health, indicating its potential as a valuable treatment option for individuals with AUD targeting controlled drinking. The model can be applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of various other AUD treatment interventions.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource AllocationVol. 23(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE)
Uppsala Universitet, Systembolaget Aktiebolag
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.