Energy-Absorbing Countermeasures for Subway-to-Pedestrian Collisions: A Combined Experimental and Multibody Modelling Approach

Epidemiological analysis has revealed key insights into the frequency, severity, and circumstances surrounding subway-to-pedestrian incidents; however, there remains a lack of available impact test data specific to this impact type that can be used in modelling and countermeasure design studies. To address this gap, nine controlled impact tests were conducted using a cylindrical headform to derive force–penetration relationships for foam, as well as foam encased in 1 mm aluminium or 3 mm ABS shells. These relationships were validated in MADYMO multibody simulations. Building on a previous multibody computational study of subway-to-pedestrian collisions this research evaluates three passive countermeasure designs using a reduced simulation test matrix: three impact velocities (8, 10, and 12 m/s) and a trough depth of 0.75 m. In subway collisions, due to the essential rigidity of a subway front relative to a pedestrian, it is the pedestrian stiffness characteristics that primarily dictate the contact dynamics, as opposed to a combined effective stiffness. However, the introduction of energy-absorbing countermeasures alters this interaction. Results indicate that modular energy-absorbing panels attached to the train front significantly reduced the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) (by 90%) in the primary impact and pedestrian-to-wheel contact risk (by 58%), with greater effectiveness when a larger frontal area was covered. However, reducing primary impact severity alone did not substantially lower total fatal injury risk. A rail-guard design, used in combination with frontal panels, reduced secondary impact severity and led to the largest overall reduction in fatal injuries. This improvement came with an expected increase in hospitalisation-level outcomes, such as limb trauma, reflecting a shift from fatal to survivable injuries. These findings demonstrate that meaningful reductions in fatalities are achievable, even with just 0.5 m of available space on the train front. While further development is needed, this study supports the conclusion that subway-to-pedestrian fatalities are preventable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116219
Primary Topic
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy-Absorbing Countermeasures for Subway-to-Pedestrian Collisions: A Combined Experimental and Multibody Modelling Approach

Daniel B. Hall, Logan Zentz, Ciaran Simms, Patrick Lynch
Applied Sciences
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
article

Energy-Absorbing Countermeasures for Subway-to-Pedestrian Collisions: A Combined Experimental and Multibody Modelling Approach

Daniel B. Hall, Logan Zentz, Ciaran Simms, Patrick Lynch
article en

Abstract

Epidemiological analysis has revealed key insights into the frequency, severity, and circumstances surrounding subway-to-pedestrian incidents; however, there remains a lack of available impact test data specific to this impact type that can be used in modelling and countermeasure design studies. To address this gap, nine controlled impact tests were conducted using a cylindrical headform to derive force–penetration relationships for foam, as well as foam encased in 1 mm aluminium or 3 mm ABS shells. These relationships were validated in MADYMO multibody simulations. Building on a previous multibody computational study of subway-to-pedestrian collisions this research evaluates three passive countermeasure designs using a reduced simulation test matrix: three impact velocities (8, 10, and 12 m/s) and a trough depth of 0.75 m. In subway collisions, due to the essential rigidity of a subway front relative to a pedestrian, it is the pedestrian stiffness characteristics that primarily dictate the contact dynamics, as opposed to a combined effective stiffness. However, the introduction of energy-absorbing countermeasures alters this interaction. Results indicate that modular energy-absorbing panels attached to the train front significantly reduced the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) (by 90%) in the primary impact and pedestrian-to-wheel contact risk (by 58%), with greater effectiveness when a larger frontal area was covered. However, reducing primary impact severity alone did not substantially lower total fatal injury risk. A rail-guard design, used in combination with frontal panels, reduced secondary impact severity and led to the largest overall reduction in fatal injuries. This improvement came with an expected increase in hospitalisation-level outcomes, such as limb trauma, reflecting a shift from fatal to survivable injuries. These findings demonstrate that meaningful reductions in fatalities are achievable, even with just 0.5 m of available space on the train front. While further development is needed, this study supports the conclusion that subway-to-pedestrian fatalities are preventable.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(11)
Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Virginia (US)
Trinity College Dublin
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.