79 (12A) Development of educational resources to support knowledge transfer related to the 6<sup>th</sup> concussion in sport consensus statement

provocation scores and NPC distance were used as independent variables to predict driving outcomes.We used separate generalized linear models for each driving outcome with group, sub-test, and a group*sub-test interaction as independent variables using a Poisson distribution.This study focused on the interaction effect.Results There was a significant interaction between group and NPC distance for centerline crossings, such that each additional 1 cm NPC distance was associated with 1.34 (95% CI:1.08-1.67)greater odds of a centerline crossing in the concussion group, relative to controls (p=0.009).NPC distance in the concussion group was 6.0 cm3.7 cm compared to 3.4 cm1.7 cm in controls.No other models were statistically significant.Conclusion NPC average distance may serve as a clinical indicator for poorer vehicle control acutely post-concussion.A larger sample size is necessary to better explore the potential impact VOMS may have on detecting post-concussion driving impairments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-concussion.79
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

79 (12A) Development of educational resources to support knowledge transfer related to the 6th concussion in sport consensus statement

Meeryo Choe, Julianne D. Schmidt, Michael Makdissi, Jacob E. Resch et al.
Delphi Technique in Research
article

79 (12A) Development of educational resources to support knowledge transfer related to the 6th concussion in sport consensus statement

Meeryo Choe, Julianne D. Schmidt, Michael Makdissi, Jacob E. Resch, Pierre Frémont, Katherine J. Hunzinger, Géraldine Martens, Stephen Bunt, Kumiko Hashida, Tamara C. Valovich McLeod, Nina Feddermann
article en

Abstract

provocation scores and NPC distance were used as independent variables to predict driving outcomes.We used separate generalized linear models for each driving outcome with group, sub-test, and a group*sub-test interaction as independent variables using a Poisson distribution.This study focused on the interaction effect.Results There was a significant interaction between group and NPC distance for centerline crossings, such that each additional 1 cm NPC distance was associated with 1.34 (95% CI:1.08-1.67)greater odds of a centerline crossing in the concussion group, relative to controls (p=0.009).NPC distance in the concussion group was 6.0 cm3.7 cm compared to 3.4 cm1.7 cm in controls.No other models were statistically significant.Conclusion NPC average distance may serve as a clinical indicator for poorer vehicle control acutely post-concussion.A larger sample size is necessary to better explore the potential impact VOMS may have on detecting post-concussion driving impairments.

Thomas Jefferson University (US), University of Liège (BE), University of Georgia (US), University of Zurich (CH), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center (US), Université Laval (CA), A.T. Still University (US), University of Virginia (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Delphi Technique in Research
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.