Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings

Overall, the MSCEIT 2 used updated theory to guide its construction and development. Its test scores fit the CHC model, and correlate with the original MSCEIT. The revised test is 33% shorter than the original.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539785
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings

Iris Y. Lin, David R. Caruso, Gill Sitarenios, Braden J. Hansma et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
9.75
article

Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings

Iris Y. Lin, David R. Caruso, Gill Sitarenios, Braden J. Hansma, John D. Mayer, Manolo Romero Escobar, Peter Salovey, Joanna Solomon
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Overall, the MSCEIT 2 used updated theory to guide its construction and development. Its test scores fit the CHC model, and correlate with the original MSCEIT. The revised test is 33% shorter than the original.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of New Hampshire (US), Yale University (US), Public Health Ontario (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.