Impact of a Brief Family Skills Training Programme “Strong Families” in a Low–Middle-Income-Country: Cambodia

<b>Introduction:</b> Children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at increased risk of emotional and behavioural challenges, often linked to caregiver stress and harsh parenting practices. Strengthening family functioning through parenting interventions is a critical strategy for improving child mental health in these settings. The Strong Families programme was developed as a light-touch family skills intervention for high-stress, low-resource environments. <b>Methods:</b> A multisite pilot feasibility and acceptability study was conducted in Cambodia with 40 families. Caregivers and children (aged 8-15) participated in a 3-week intervention, with one session per week. Data were collected using the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R) at baseline, two weeks, and six weeks post-intervention. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman's ANOVA were used to assess changes over time. <b>Results:</b> Caregivers showed statistically significant improvements across all PAFAS subscales. For example, coercive parenting scores decreased from 8.13 at baseline to 4.00 post-intervention and 2.33 at follow-up (F(2,78) = 59.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Positive encouragement improved from 2.60 to 1.00 and 0.33, respectively (F(2,78) = 27.05, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In terms of child outcomes, SDQ total difficulty scores declined from 20.68 to 16.55 over time (F(2,78) = 7.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Emotional problems dropped from 5.60 to 2.38 (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 21.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and conduct problems from 4.33 to 2.68 (F(2,78) = 11.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prosocial behaviours increased from 5.60 to 9.45 (F(2,78) = 69.93, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Personal resilience scores rose from 32.70 at baseline to 47.48 at follow-up (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 62.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while caregiver resilience improved from 23.63 to 33.63 (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 61.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Improvements were particularly pronounced among families with the highest baseline challenges. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings indicate that the Strong Families programme is feasible and effective in improving parenting skills, family adjustment, child mental health, and resilience in a Cambodian LMIC context. These results reinforce the programme's potential for integration into broader national strategies to improve psychosocial outcomes for families in high-stress, low-resource environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060728
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a Brief Family Skills Training Programme “Strong Families” in a Low–Middle-Income-Country: Cambodia

Wadih Maalouf, Sopheaktra Chea, Dina Idriss-Wheeler, Sabreen A Darwish et al.
Children
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Impact of a Brief Family Skills Training Programme “Strong Families” in a Low–Middle-Income-Country: Cambodia

Wadih Maalouf, Sopheaktra Chea, Dina Idriss-Wheeler, Sabreen A Darwish, Aala El‐Khani
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at increased risk of emotional and behavioural challenges, often linked to caregiver stress and harsh parenting practices. Strengthening family functioning through parenting interventions is a critical strategy for improving child mental health in these settings. The Strong Families programme was developed as a light-touch family skills intervention for high-stress, low-resource environments. <b>Methods:</b> A multisite pilot feasibility and acceptability study was conducted in Cambodia with 40 families. Caregivers and children (aged 8-15) participated in a 3-week intervention, with one session per week. Data were collected using the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R) at baseline, two weeks, and six weeks post-intervention. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman's ANOVA were used to assess changes over time. <b>Results:</b> Caregivers showed statistically significant improvements across all PAFAS subscales. For example, coercive parenting scores decreased from 8.13 at baseline to 4.00 post-intervention and 2.33 at follow-up (F(2,78) = 59.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Positive encouragement improved from 2.60 to 1.00 and 0.33, respectively (F(2,78) = 27.05, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In terms of child outcomes, SDQ total difficulty scores declined from 20.68 to 16.55 over time (F(2,78) = 7.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Emotional problems dropped from 5.60 to 2.38 (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 21.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and conduct problems from 4.33 to 2.68 (F(2,78) = 11.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prosocial behaviours increased from 5.60 to 9.45 (F(2,78) = 69.93, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Personal resilience scores rose from 32.70 at baseline to 47.48 at follow-up (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 62.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while caregiver resilience improved from 23.63 to 33.63 (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 61.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Improvements were particularly pronounced among families with the highest baseline challenges. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings indicate that the Strong Families programme is feasible and effective in improving parenting skills, family adjustment, child mental health, and resilience in a Cambodian LMIC context. These results reinforce the programme's potential for integration into broader national strategies to improve psychosocial outcomes for families in high-stress, low-resource environments.

ChildrenVol. 12(6)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Manchester (GB), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (AT)
Strong, Mission Interministérielle de Lutte Contre les Drogues et les Conduites Addictives
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.