Teaching chemical product design

The CACHE Design Task Force has conducted a comprehensive, year-long study on the teaching of chemical product design across global chemical engineering programs. This paper reviews existing literature and highlights distinctions between product and process design, emphasizing the predominance of process design education in universities. Drawing from co-author contributions and responses to a widely distributed questionnaire, we present recent teaching methodologies for chemical product design. The paper discusses trends in chemical engineering diversification and the gradual inclusion of diverse applications in curricula. It concludes with a call to action for chemical engineering educators to integrate well-established product design strategies into undergraduate programs and reflects on insights shared during the 2024 FOCAPD Conference. • Results of a 1-year study of the teaching of chemical product design worldwide. • Distinctions between teaching product and process design. • Current practice and motivation to teach process design at most universities. • Industrial practices in carrying out product design. • Challenges of merging product design strategies into the ChE undergraduate curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education for Chemical Engineers
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.04.002
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching chemical product design

M. M. Faruque Hasan, John D. Hedengren, Patrick T. Spicer, Christos T. Maravelias et al.
Education for Chemical Engineers
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Teaching chemical product design

M. M. Faruque Hasan, John D. Hedengren, Patrick T. Spicer, Christos T. Maravelias, Tobias Hanrath, Mahmoud M. El‐Halwagi, Laura Hirshfield, Todd M. Squires, Warren D. Seider, M. Saad Bhamla, Jean W. Tom, Stuart W. Prescott, Cristina U. Thomas, Xiaoxia Nina Lin, Elaine C. Wisniewski, Jennifer Dunn, Victor M. Zavala, Minnie Piffarerio, Kathleent M. Vaeth
article en

Abstract

The CACHE Design Task Force has conducted a comprehensive, year-long study on the teaching of chemical product design across global chemical engineering programs. This paper reviews existing literature and highlights distinctions between product and process design, emphasizing the predominance of process design education in universities. Drawing from co-author contributions and responses to a widely distributed questionnaire, we present recent teaching methodologies for chemical product design. The paper discusses trends in chemical engineering diversification and the gradual inclusion of diverse applications in curricula. It concludes with a call to action for chemical engineering educators to integrate well-established product design strategies into undergraduate programs and reflects on insights shared during the 2024 FOCAPD Conference. • Results of a 1-year study of the teaching of chemical product design worldwide. • Distinctions between teaching product and process design. • Current practice and motivation to teach process design at most universities. • Industrial practices in carrying out product design. • Challenges of merging product design strategies into the ChE undergraduate curriculum.

Education for Chemical EngineersVol. 52
Brigham Young University (US), Northwestern University (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Princeton University (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), Mitchell Institute (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), Comagine Health (US), Adam Taliaferro Foundation (US), Michigan United (US), Texas A&M University (US), Colorado State University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.