Size effect and rock mass strength

The size effect associated with rock mass strength is assessed from the perspective of laboratory testing data, hard rock pillar data, excavation back analysis data, and synthetic rock mass (SRM) models. The assessments are completed to investigate whether the size effect is due to increasing rock mass volume or for other reasons. The size effect is well established as one of the reasons field scale rock mass strength is less than that measured in the laboratory. We find that the observation of the size effect for rock masses in the field is due to failure mechanism change instead of size. In addition, we show that SRM specimens, as currently numerically tested and interpreted, do not provide a sound means for estimating rock mass strength unless boundary conditions, structural character, and failure mechanisms are adequately considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0531
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size effect and rock mass strength

Davide Elmo, R. P. Bewick
6 citations
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
5.18
article

Size effect and rock mass strength

Davide Elmo, R. P. Bewick
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The size effect associated with rock mass strength is assessed from the perspective of laboratory testing data, hard rock pillar data, excavation back analysis data, and synthetic rock mass (SRM) models. The assessments are completed to investigate whether the size effect is due to increasing rock mass volume or for other reasons. The size effect is well established as one of the reasons field scale rock mass strength is less than that measured in the laboratory. We find that the observation of the size effect for rock masses in the field is due to failure mechanism change instead of size. In addition, we show that SRM specimens, as currently numerically tested and interpreted, do not provide a sound means for estimating rock mass strength unless boundary conditions, structural character, and failure mechanisms are adequately considered.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Size effect and rock mass strength — Davide Elmo, R. P. Bewick · Canadian Geotechnical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS