Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of filtered tailings stacks by means of laboratory investigation

Filtered tailings are typically transported, placed, and compacted into embankments to form unsaturated, dense stacks. For economic reasons, these stacks must be raised with maximum productivity and minimal possible cost. Achieving this may involve using thicker compaction layers than in conventional embankments, along with employing bulldozers and trucks in place of rollers. However, increasing the layer thickness often leads to lower compaction within individual layers. To assess the geotechnical behavior of filtered tailings, laboratory testing was conducted on three layers of varying thickness within a test embankment. The results were evaluated within a critical state soil mechanics framework to assess the susceptibility of filtered tailings to static liquefaction. The degree of compaction (DC) was found to play a crucial role in determining the mechanical behavior of the filtered tailings. Samples with lower compaction levels showed a reduction in post-peak shear strength during undrained tests, making them more susceptible to liquefaction. The instability line was found to be sensitive to DC in all layers. The undrained brittleness index was also calculated to assess the potential loss of shear strength due to liquefaction. Therefore, ensuring adequate compaction is crucial to preventing the liquefaction of filtered tailings and maintaining the stability of the embankments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0274
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of filtered tailings stacks by means of laboratory investigation

Romário Stéffano Amaro da Silva, Regina Glória Nunes Andrade, Márcio de Souza Soares de Almeida, Sparsha Sinduri Nagula
2 citations
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
article

Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of filtered tailings stacks by means of laboratory investigation

Romário Stéffano Amaro da Silva, Regina Glória Nunes Andrade, Márcio de Souza Soares de Almeida, Sparsha Sinduri Nagula
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Filtered tailings are typically transported, placed, and compacted into embankments to form unsaturated, dense stacks. For economic reasons, these stacks must be raised with maximum productivity and minimal possible cost. Achieving this may involve using thicker compaction layers than in conventional embankments, along with employing bulldozers and trucks in place of rollers. However, increasing the layer thickness often leads to lower compaction within individual layers. To assess the geotechnical behavior of filtered tailings, laboratory testing was conducted on three layers of varying thickness within a test embankment. The results were evaluated within a critical state soil mechanics framework to assess the susceptibility of filtered tailings to static liquefaction. The degree of compaction (DC) was found to play a crucial role in determining the mechanical behavior of the filtered tailings. Samples with lower compaction levels showed a reduction in post-peak shear strength during undrained tests, making them more susceptible to liquefaction. The instability line was found to be sensitive to DC in all layers. The undrained brittleness index was also calculated to assess the potential loss of shear strength due to liquefaction. Therefore, ensuring adequate compaction is crucial to preventing the liquefaction of filtered tailings and maintaining the stability of the embankments.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.