Consumer (Mis)Understanding of Dietary Supplement Labels

“Helps lower cholesterol levels” and “helps promote healthy cholesterol levels.” Both of these claims are found on pharmacy products. And to ordinary consumers, the message is the same: take this pill and improve your cholesterol. Nevertheless, Congress has placed these statements in two very different regulatory categories. The former is classified as a disease claim, and the latter as a structure/function claim. Whereas products making disease claims require years of clinical trials and analyses before regulatory approval can be granted, products making structure/function claims do not even require governmental review before they can be sold to consumers. This bifurcated regulatory system and the concomitant lack of oversight regarding structure/function claims has encouraged dietary supplement manufacturers to produce thousands of products that mislead consumers. This Article investigates this phenomenon and proposes a change to the regulation of dietary supplement claims. Specifically, we contend that the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) should regulate claims that mean the same thing in the same manner

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M Law Review
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/lr.v12.i4.2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer (Mis)Understanding of Dietary Supplement Labels

Madison K. Kilbride, Jason Iuliano
Texas A&M Law Review
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Consumer (Mis)Understanding of Dietary Supplement Labels

Madison K. Kilbride, Jason Iuliano
article en

Abstract

“Helps lower cholesterol levels” and “helps promote healthy cholesterol levels.” Both of these claims are found on pharmacy products. And to ordinary consumers, the message is the same: take this pill and improve your cholesterol. Nevertheless, Congress has placed these statements in two very different regulatory categories. The former is classified as a disease claim, and the latter as a structure/function claim. Whereas products making disease claims require years of clinical trials and analyses before regulatory approval can be granted, products making structure/function claims do not even require governmental review before they can be sold to consumers. This bifurcated regulatory system and the concomitant lack of oversight regarding structure/function claims has encouraged dietary supplement manufacturers to produce thousands of products that mislead consumers. This Article investigates this phenomenon and proposes a change to the regulation of dietary supplement claims. Specifically, we contend that the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) should regulate claims that mean the same thing in the same manner

Texas A&M Law ReviewVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consumer (Mis)Understanding of Dietary Supplement Labels — Madison K. Kilbride, Jason Iuliano · Texas A&M Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS