Modal Analysis of Self-Deployable Tape Spring Booms: A Reverse Engineering Approach

Abstract Extendable booms for deploying payloads, solar sails, and antennas are promising, but developing a correlated modal analysis model of these sensitive systems using conventional methods remains challenging. To address this issue, we have taken a novel reverse engineering approach for integrating high-density and -accuracy 3D-scanning geometric data into a finite element analysis (FEA) model, reducing errors relative to conventional methods. Ut ProSat-1 (UPS-1), a 3U CubeSat built by Virginia Tech, aims to repeatedly passively self-deploy a parabolic tape spring boom on orbit to characterize boom dynamics experimentally. However, conventional modeling methods were not sufficient to capture the boom’s modal parameters, which are highly sensitive to geometry defects. Here, we develop a methodology to reduce geometric errors that affect the modal response of the boom by using a novel method to generate a high-density, high-accuracy 3D point cloud from a laser scanner and build a corresponding FEA model and verify that method relative to experiments. Three FEA models were created: an ideal geometry case, a geometry developed from discrete measurement of the boom’s cross section along its length, and a high-fidelity geometry developed from a 3D laser scanner-derived point cloud. The method used in this effort is an efficient and accurate method to generate an FEA Point Cloud Model based on 3D laser scanner data. The Point Cloud Model was shown to achieve a position error of 0.1 mm, while the idealized geometry and measured models had a much larger error of 13 mm and 7 mm, respectively. The Point Cloud Model resulted in a first mode frequency error of only 1.2% relative to the 7.7% error for the discrete modeling method and 27% for the ideal constant cross section geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of vibration and acoustics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068812
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modal Analysis of Self-Deployable Tape Spring Booms: A Reverse Engineering Approach

Austin A. Phoenix, Jonathan Black, Deven Mhadgut, Samantha Parry Kenyon
1 citations
Journal of vibration and acoustics
Structural Analysis and Optimization
0.95
article

Modal Analysis of Self-Deployable Tape Spring Booms: A Reverse Engineering Approach

Austin A. Phoenix, Jonathan Black, Deven Mhadgut, Samantha Parry Kenyon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Extendable booms for deploying payloads, solar sails, and antennas are promising, but developing a correlated modal analysis model of these sensitive systems using conventional methods remains challenging. To address this issue, we have taken a novel reverse engineering approach for integrating high-density and -accuracy 3D-scanning geometric data into a finite element analysis (FEA) model, reducing errors relative to conventional methods. Ut ProSat-1 (UPS-1), a 3U CubeSat built by Virginia Tech, aims to repeatedly passively self-deploy a parabolic tape spring boom on orbit to characterize boom dynamics experimentally. However, conventional modeling methods were not sufficient to capture the boom’s modal parameters, which are highly sensitive to geometry defects. Here, we develop a methodology to reduce geometric errors that affect the modal response of the boom by using a novel method to generate a high-density, high-accuracy 3D point cloud from a laser scanner and build a corresponding FEA model and verify that method relative to experiments. Three FEA models were created: an ideal geometry case, a geometry developed from discrete measurement of the boom’s cross section along its length, and a high-fidelity geometry developed from a 3D laser scanner-derived point cloud. The method used in this effort is an efficient and accurate method to generate an FEA Point Cloud Model based on 3D laser scanner data. The Point Cloud Model was shown to achieve a position error of 0.1 mm, while the idealized geometry and measured models had a much larger error of 13 mm and 7 mm, respectively. The Point Cloud Model resulted in a first mode frequency error of only 1.2% relative to the 7.7% error for the discrete modeling method and 27% for the ideal constant cross section geometry.

Journal of vibration and acousticsVol. 147(5)
Northrop Grumman (United States) (US), Graf Research (United States) (US), Gallagher (United States) (US), Virginia Tech (US), SUNY Polytechnic Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Structural Analysis and Optimization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.