Automatic detection of Ellerman bombs using deep learning

Context. Ellerman bombs (EBs) are observable signatures of photospheric small-scale magnetic reconnection events. They can be seen as intensity enhancements of the H α 6563 Å line wings and as brightenings in the SDO/AIA 1600 Å and 1700 Å passbands. Reliable automatic and systematic detection of EBs would enable the study of the impact of magnetic reconnection on the Sun’s dynamics. Aims. We aim to develop a method to automatically detect EBs in H α observations from the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope (SST) and in SDO/AIA observations using the 1600 Å, 1700 Å, 171 Å, and 304 Å passbands. Methods. We trained models based on neural networks (NNs) to perform automatic detection of EBs. Additionally, we used different types of NNs to study how different properties – such as local spatial information, the spectral shape of each pixel, or the center-to-limb variation – contribute to the detection of EBs. Results. We find that for SST observations, the NN-based models are proficient at detecting EBs. With sufficiently high spectral resolution, the spatial context is not required to detect EBs. However, as we degrade the spectral and spatial resolution, the spatial information becomes more important. Models that include both dimensions perform best. For SDO/AIA, the models struggle to reliably distinguish between EBs and bright patches of different origin. Permutation feature importance revealed that the H α line wings (around ± 1 Å from line center) are the most informative features for EB detection. For the SDO/AIA case, the 1600 Å channel is the most relevant one when used in combination with 171 Å and 304 Å. Conclusions. The combination of the four different SDO/AIA passbands is not informative enough to accurately classify EBs. From our analysis of a few sample SDO/AIA 1600 Å and 1700 Å light curves, we conclude that inclusion of the temporal variation may be a significant step towards establishing an effective EB detection method that can be applied to the extensive SDO/AIA database of observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453524
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic detection of Ellerman bombs using deep learning

C. J. Díaz Baso, L. Rouppe van der Voort, G. J. M. Vissers, Ignasi J. Soler Poquet
1 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
1.15
article

Automatic detection of Ellerman bombs using deep learning

C. J. Díaz Baso, L. Rouppe van der Voort, G. J. M. Vissers, Ignasi J. Soler Poquet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context. Ellerman bombs (EBs) are observable signatures of photospheric small-scale magnetic reconnection events. They can be seen as intensity enhancements of the H α 6563 Å line wings and as brightenings in the SDO/AIA 1600 Å and 1700 Å passbands. Reliable automatic and systematic detection of EBs would enable the study of the impact of magnetic reconnection on the Sun’s dynamics. Aims. We aim to develop a method to automatically detect EBs in H α observations from the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope (SST) and in SDO/AIA observations using the 1600 Å, 1700 Å, 171 Å, and 304 Å passbands. Methods. We trained models based on neural networks (NNs) to perform automatic detection of EBs. Additionally, we used different types of NNs to study how different properties – such as local spatial information, the spectral shape of each pixel, or the center-to-limb variation – contribute to the detection of EBs. Results. We find that for SST observations, the NN-based models are proficient at detecting EBs. With sufficiently high spectral resolution, the spatial context is not required to detect EBs. However, as we degrade the spectral and spatial resolution, the spatial information becomes more important. Models that include both dimensions perform best. For SDO/AIA, the models struggle to reliably distinguish between EBs and bright patches of different origin. Permutation feature importance revealed that the H α line wings (around ± 1 Å from line center) are the most informative features for EB detection. For the SDO/AIA case, the 1600 Å channel is the most relevant one when used in combination with 171 Å and 304 Å. Conclusions. The combination of the four different SDO/AIA passbands is not informative enough to accurately classify EBs. From our analysis of a few sample SDO/AIA 1600 Å and 1700 Å light curves, we conclude that inclusion of the temporal variation may be a significant step towards establishing an effective EB detection method that can be applied to the extensive SDO/AIA database of observations.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 699
University of Oslo (NO)
Vetenskapsrådet, Norges Forskningsråd, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.