Is DP conjunction always complex? The view from child Georgian and Hungarian

Mitrović & Sauerland (2014, 2016) claim that, across languages, DP-conjunction decomposes into [JP [MuP [DP1 ⟳] MU] [J’ J [MuP [DP2 ⟳] MU]]]. Their account, when combined with the independently motivated assumption that children better comprehend utterances which display a greater degree of 1-to-1 mapping between form and meaning (van Hout 2008, Guasti et al. 2023: a.o.), predicts that sentences where only J or MU are pronounced should be harder to comprehend relative to sentences where both J and MU are realized. We conducted an experiment testing this prediction by investigating children’s comprehension of conjunctive expressions in Georgian and Hungarian. While, for Hungarian, we did not find any differences between the types of conjunctive expressions, for Georgian, we found evidence that J-MU expressions were harder for children to comprehend than J or MU expressions. Our results challenge the account by Mitrović & Sauerland (2014, 2016) and cannot be captured by other existing accounts of conjunctive expressions either (Szabolcsi 2015, Haslinger et al. 2019). EARLY ACCESS

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semantics and Pragmatics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.18.5
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is DP conjunction always complex? The view from child Georgian and Hungarian

Cory Bill, Imke Driemel, Lilla Pintér, Tamar Makharoblidze et al.
Semantics and Pragmatics
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Is DP conjunction always complex? The view from child Georgian and Hungarian

Cory Bill, Imke Driemel, Lilla Pintér, Tamar Makharoblidze, Aurore Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Mitrović & Sauerland (2014, 2016) claim that, across languages, DP-conjunction decomposes into [JP [MuP [DP1 ⟳] MU] [J’ J [MuP [DP2 ⟳] MU]]]. Their account, when combined with the independently motivated assumption that children better comprehend utterances which display a greater degree of 1-to-1 mapping between form and meaning (van Hout 2008, Guasti et al. 2023: a.o.), predicts that sentences where only J or MU are pronounced should be harder to comprehend relative to sentences where both J and MU are realized. We conducted an experiment testing this prediction by investigating children’s comprehension of conjunctive expressions in Georgian and Hungarian. While, for Hungarian, we did not find any differences between the types of conjunctive expressions, for Georgian, we found evidence that J-MU expressions were harder for children to comprehend than J or MU expressions. Our results challenge the account by Mitrović & Sauerland (2014, 2016) and cannot be captured by other existing accounts of conjunctive expressions either (Szabolcsi 2015, Haslinger et al. 2019). EARLY ACCESS

Semantics and PragmaticsVol. 18(5)
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is DP conjunction always complex? The view from child Georgian and Hungarian — Cory Bill, Imke Driemel, et al. · Semantics and Pragmatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS