A new perspective on models and theories of simultaneous interpreting

Abstract In this article, we consider influential theories and models of simultaneous interpreting through the prism of current theories and findings in psycholinguistics. We review evidence suggesting that meaning is routinely accessed during comprehension, and, on this basis, suggest that it is unlikely that interpreters produce translation equivalents without accessing meaning. We also reflect on data showing cross-linguistic activation in two-language settings, and suggest that such cross-linguistic activation regularly takes place in simultaneous interpreting, without interfering with the processing of meaning. Finally, we consider the role of prediction in simultaneous interpreting. Evidence suggests that prediction regularly takes place during simultaneous interpreting and may facilitate the interpreting process. On the basis of this theoretical analysis, we consider that simultaneous interpreting involves a synergy, rather than just an overlap, of comprehension and production. We outline the pedagogical implications of our conclusions, and explain why viewing simultaneous interpreting from this new perspective may open up directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Target International Journal of Translation Studies
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.00031.amo
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new perspective on models and theories of simultaneous interpreting

Rhona M. Amos, Martin J. Pickering
Target International Journal of Translation Studies
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

A new perspective on models and theories of simultaneous interpreting

Rhona M. Amos, Martin J. Pickering
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we consider influential theories and models of simultaneous interpreting through the prism of current theories and findings in psycholinguistics. We review evidence suggesting that meaning is routinely accessed during comprehension, and, on this basis, suggest that it is unlikely that interpreters produce translation equivalents without accessing meaning. We also reflect on data showing cross-linguistic activation in two-language settings, and suggest that such cross-linguistic activation regularly takes place in simultaneous interpreting, without interfering with the processing of meaning. Finally, we consider the role of prediction in simultaneous interpreting. Evidence suggests that prediction regularly takes place during simultaneous interpreting and may facilitate the interpreting process. On the basis of this theoretical analysis, we consider that simultaneous interpreting involves a synergy, rather than just an overlap, of comprehension and production. We outline the pedagogical implications of our conclusions, and explain why viewing simultaneous interpreting from this new perspective may open up directions for future research.

Target International Journal of Translation StudiesVol. 37(2)
University of Geneva (CH), Stockholm University (SE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.