Theoretical Study of 1s, 2s, and 2p Core Electron Binding Energies of Third-Period Elements Calculated by the ΔSCF Method, Koopmans’ Theorem, and Slater’s Transition State Theory within the Framework of Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham Theory

The binding energies (BEs) of the 1s, 2s, and 2p core electrons of third-period elements were calculated using the ΔSCF method, Koopmans' theorem, and Slater's transition state theory (STS), within the frameworks of Hartree-Fock (HF) and Kohn-Sham (KS) theory, employing B3LYP and LC2gau-core-BOP (LC2gau) functionals. The total self-consistent field (SCF) energy difference (ΔSCF) between neutral and cationic states was obtained by solving the SCF equations with fractional occupation numbers. Energy functionals were plotted as a function of continuously varying occupation numbers, and the validity of Koopmans' theorem and STS theory was assessed by analyzing the derivative of the energy functional with respect to occupation number. The HF ΔSCF method reproduces the experimental core electron binding energies (CEBEs) of third-period elements with reasonable accuracy. STS theory within HF closely matches the ΔSCF values, though the errors relative to experimental results are nearly identical to those of the ΔSCF approach. In contrast, the B3LYP ΔSCF method slightly underestimates the experimental BEs of 1s and 2p electrons and significantly underestimates the 2s BEs, primarily due to self-interaction errors (SIEs) inherent in the functional. The LC2gau ΔSCF method effectively eliminates the SIEs for 2s electrons and provides BE values with improved accuracy. Koopmans' theorem holds well in the LC2gau framework, reproducing ΔSCF results with reasonable accuracy. Interestingly, the error between ΔSCF and experimental values is approximately equal in magnitude─but opposite in sign─to the error between Koopmans' theorem and ΔSCF, particularly for 1s and 2s BEs. As a result of this error cancellation, Koopmans' approach with LC2gau predicts CEBEs closer to the experimental values, achieving a high level of accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c01460
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical Study of 1s, 2s, and 2p Core Electron Binding Energies of Third-Period Elements Calculated by the ΔSCF Method, Koopmans’ Theorem, and Slater’s Transition State Theory within the Framework of Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham Theory

Jong‐Won Song, D. S. Ahn, Takahito Nakajima, Kimihiko Hirao et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.25
article

Theoretical Study of 1s, 2s, and 2p Core Electron Binding Energies of Third-Period Elements Calculated by the ΔSCF Method, Koopmans’ Theorem, and Slater’s Transition State Theory within the Framework of Hartree–Fock and Kohn–Sham Theory

Jong‐Won Song, D. S. Ahn, Takahito Nakajima, Kimihiko Hirao, Bun Chan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The binding energies (BEs) of the 1s, 2s, and 2p core electrons of third-period elements were calculated using the ΔSCF method, Koopmans' theorem, and Slater's transition state theory (STS), within the frameworks of Hartree-Fock (HF) and Kohn-Sham (KS) theory, employing B3LYP and LC2gau-core-BOP (LC2gau) functionals. The total self-consistent field (SCF) energy difference (ΔSCF) between neutral and cationic states was obtained by solving the SCF equations with fractional occupation numbers. Energy functionals were plotted as a function of continuously varying occupation numbers, and the validity of Koopmans' theorem and STS theory was assessed by analyzing the derivative of the energy functional with respect to occupation number. The HF ΔSCF method reproduces the experimental core electron binding energies (CEBEs) of third-period elements with reasonable accuracy. STS theory within HF closely matches the ΔSCF values, though the errors relative to experimental results are nearly identical to those of the ΔSCF approach. In contrast, the B3LYP ΔSCF method slightly underestimates the experimental BEs of 1s and 2p electrons and significantly underestimates the 2s BEs, primarily due to self-interaction errors (SIEs) inherent in the functional. The LC2gau ΔSCF method effectively eliminates the SIEs for 2s electrons and provides BE values with improved accuracy. Koopmans' theorem holds well in the LC2gau framework, reproducing ΔSCF results with reasonable accuracy. Interestingly, the error between ΔSCF and experimental values is approximately equal in magnitude─but opposite in sign─to the error between Koopmans' theorem and ΔSCF, particularly for 1s and 2s BEs. As a result of this error cancellation, Koopmans' approach with LC2gau predicts CEBEs closer to the experimental values, achieving a high level of accuracy.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 129(23)
Kyoto University (JP), RIKEN Center for Computational Science (JP), Nagasaki University (JP), Daegu University (KR)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.