Supporting OB-GYNs in Abortion-Restrictive States: A Playbook for Institutions

( JAMA . 2024;332(8):613–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10270) The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has thrown abortion legislation throughout the nation into disarray, with each state imposing its own unique laws. In states with near-total abortion bans, obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) are now faced with decisions between legal ramifications and providing patients with the accepted standards of care. Many OB-GYNs have left states with such bans due to stress associated with these weighty decisions, which has reduced the availability of women’s health care in some areas of the nation and may impact morbidity and mortality. This article is an opinion piece focusing on the personal and professional effects of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs as of March 2023, focusing on institutional support and recommendations to both support and retain OB-GYNs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001113008.23779.6a
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting OB-GYNs in Abortion-Restrictive States: A Playbook for Institutions

Mara Buchbinder, Kashmiri L. Arora, EL Sabbath
Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Supporting OB-GYNs in Abortion-Restrictive States: A Playbook for Institutions

Mara Buchbinder, Kashmiri L. Arora, EL Sabbath
article en

Abstract

( JAMA . 2024;332(8):613–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10270) The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has thrown abortion legislation throughout the nation into disarray, with each state imposing its own unique laws. In states with near-total abortion bans, obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) are now faced with decisions between legal ramifications and providing patients with the accepted standards of care. Many OB-GYNs have left states with such bans due to stress associated with these weighty decisions, which has reduced the availability of women’s health care in some areas of the nation and may impact morbidity and mortality. This article is an opinion piece focusing on the personal and professional effects of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs as of March 2023, focusing on institutional support and recommendations to both support and retain OB-GYNs.

Obstetric Anesthesia DigestVol. 45(2)
Boston College (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.