POST-COARCTATION INTERVENTION: CT-ANGIOGRAPHY ARCH MORPHOLOGY FINDING VERSUS ECHO FINDING

Aortic Arch Morphological Assessment with Echocardiography and Computerized Tomography-Angiography The study is based on the case of coarctated aorta whose it is one of the most occurrence diseases among congenital cardiovascular malformations in newborns. The study would evaluate the suitability and efficiency between the two before and after treatment. The findings of this study may be applied to later make clinical decisions as well as develop patient’s treatment policy. Objectives Compare Echocardiography findings with Computerized Tomography-Angiography outcomes for evaluation of post-coarctation aortic arch morphology. Patients and Methods People in the study had undergone coarctation repair either surgical or interventional techniques; they were subjected to echocardiography and Computerized Tomography-Angiography follow up post intervention. Results The study says that comparing Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography to look at the shape of the aortic arch after coarctation intervention showed big differences. The mean aortic diameter measurements were different between the two imaging methods (for each patient four readings were taken for each modality). The third reading with echocardiography showed a larger mean diameter, which was statistically significant (p 0.001). According to the findings of the Spearman test, there was no appreciable positive correlation between the readings from the two modalities. The study emphasizes the significance of cautious modality selection depending on the clinical circumstances for accurate assessment and the best possible patient treatment. Conclusion The study thoroughly compares the evaluation of post-interventional coarctation of the Aorta patients using the Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography methodologies. The two imaging procedures were very close except for minute differences that proved useful. nonetheless, every patient must be carefully evaluated independently. This study emphasized choosing imaging modality with a true picture of the patient’s condition so that it would be appropriate for them to use Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography. The procedure for enlarging the coarctation and assisting in post-surgical recovery of patients. As such, further investigations may be conducted to establish if the images will predict future clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sulaimani Medical College
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10478
Primary Topic
Blind Source Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POST-COARCTATION INTERVENTION: CT-ANGIOGRAPHY ARCH MORPHOLOGY FINDING VERSUS ECHO FINDING

Koyan Abdulhameed
Journal of Sulaimani Medical College
Blind Source Separation Techniques
article

POST-COARCTATION INTERVENTION: CT-ANGIOGRAPHY ARCH MORPHOLOGY FINDING VERSUS ECHO FINDING

Koyan Abdulhameed
article en

Abstract

Aortic Arch Morphological Assessment with Echocardiography and Computerized Tomography-Angiography The study is based on the case of coarctated aorta whose it is one of the most occurrence diseases among congenital cardiovascular malformations in newborns. The study would evaluate the suitability and efficiency between the two before and after treatment. The findings of this study may be applied to later make clinical decisions as well as develop patient’s treatment policy. Objectives Compare Echocardiography findings with Computerized Tomography-Angiography outcomes for evaluation of post-coarctation aortic arch morphology. Patients and Methods People in the study had undergone coarctation repair either surgical or interventional techniques; they were subjected to echocardiography and Computerized Tomography-Angiography follow up post intervention. Results The study says that comparing Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography to look at the shape of the aortic arch after coarctation intervention showed big differences. The mean aortic diameter measurements were different between the two imaging methods (for each patient four readings were taken for each modality). The third reading with echocardiography showed a larger mean diameter, which was statistically significant (p 0.001). According to the findings of the Spearman test, there was no appreciable positive correlation between the readings from the two modalities. The study emphasizes the significance of cautious modality selection depending on the clinical circumstances for accurate assessment and the best possible patient treatment. Conclusion The study thoroughly compares the evaluation of post-interventional coarctation of the Aorta patients using the Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography methodologies. The two imaging procedures were very close except for minute differences that proved useful. nonetheless, every patient must be carefully evaluated independently. This study emphasized choosing imaging modality with a true picture of the patient’s condition so that it would be appropriate for them to use Computerized Tomography-Angiography and echocardiography. The procedure for enlarging the coarctation and assisting in post-surgical recovery of patients. As such, further investigations may be conducted to establish if the images will predict future clinical outcomes.

Journal of Sulaimani Medical CollegeVol. 14(3)
American University of Iraq Sulaimani (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Blind Source Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.