A Misogynistic Glitch? A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Content Moderation

In recent years, all leading social media platforms have integrated artificial intelligence (AI) into their content moderation workflows. An increasingly prevalent narrative suggests that algorithms capable of detecting and removing prohibited or harmful content are crucial for ensuring that marginalised groups have equal opportunities to participate in civic discourse. Drawing on feminist theory, this article disproves this narrative. It begins by unpacking the evolution of perceptions of algorithmic content moderation, shining a light on the recent departure from simplistic efficiency considerations towards a more compelling portrayal of AI as a means of fostering a more inclusive dialogue online. It then examines how the use of AI for detecting and removing violative material further marginalises – rather than empowers – women who are seeking to engage on social media. Apart from being unable to properly address online gender-based violence and misogyny, algorithms employed in content moderation often erroneously restrict women’s lawful counter-speech, thus preventing them from contributing to public debate. The article concludes with brief reflections on how the inevitable expansion of technological solutions in content moderation could be aligned with feminist ideals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3848
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Misogynistic Glitch? A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Content Moderation

Valentina Golunova
Law Technology and Humans
Digital Media and Philosophy
article

A Misogynistic Glitch? A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Content Moderation

Valentina Golunova
article en

Abstract

In recent years, all leading social media platforms have integrated artificial intelligence (AI) into their content moderation workflows. An increasingly prevalent narrative suggests that algorithms capable of detecting and removing prohibited or harmful content are crucial for ensuring that marginalised groups have equal opportunities to participate in civic discourse. Drawing on feminist theory, this article disproves this narrative. It begins by unpacking the evolution of perceptions of algorithmic content moderation, shining a light on the recent departure from simplistic efficiency considerations towards a more compelling portrayal of AI as a means of fostering a more inclusive dialogue online. It then examines how the use of AI for detecting and removing violative material further marginalises – rather than empowers – women who are seeking to engage on social media. Apart from being unable to properly address online gender-based violence and misogyny, algorithms employed in content moderation often erroneously restrict women’s lawful counter-speech, thus preventing them from contributing to public debate. The article concludes with brief reflections on how the inevitable expansion of technological solutions in content moderation could be aligned with feminist ideals.

Law Technology and Humans
Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Digital Media and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Misogynistic Glitch? A Feminist Critique of Algorithmic Content Moderation — Valentina Golunova · Law Technology and Humans (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS