Sensemaking in philanthropic foundations: developing a taxonomy and typology to understand identity and accountability

This article examines taxonomies and typologies as sensemaking processes to better understand identity and accountability in philanthropic foundations. While these organisations are established for public benefit purposes, public knowledge on them is limited, and concerns exist regarding their transparency, accountability and legitimacy. Challenges in the development of a taxonomy and typology as systematic processes of sensemaking are explored, providing nuanced insights into this organisational group’s identity and accountability. Publicly available data from two separate sources are examined as the basis for a taxonomy, and semi-structured interviews exploring accountability and identity provide the basis for a typology. This article highlights the importance of examining underlying commonalities as well as observable differences within a set of organisations, and exploring the interplay between the two. Collectively, findings from these sensemaking processes offer valuable insights into philanthropic foundations’ identity and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voluntary Sector Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2025d000000044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensemaking in philanthropic foundations: developing a taxonomy and typology to understand identity and accountability

Alexandra Williamson, Belinda Luke
1 citations
Voluntary Sector Review
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
article

Sensemaking in philanthropic foundations: developing a taxonomy and typology to understand identity and accountability

Alexandra Williamson, Belinda Luke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines taxonomies and typologies as sensemaking processes to better understand identity and accountability in philanthropic foundations. While these organisations are established for public benefit purposes, public knowledge on them is limited, and concerns exist regarding their transparency, accountability and legitimacy. Challenges in the development of a taxonomy and typology as systematic processes of sensemaking are explored, providing nuanced insights into this organisational group’s identity and accountability. Publicly available data from two separate sources are examined as the basis for a taxonomy, and semi-structured interviews exploring accountability and identity provide the basis for a typology. This article highlights the importance of examining underlying commonalities as well as observable differences within a set of organisations, and exploring the interplay between the two. Collectively, findings from these sensemaking processes offer valuable insights into philanthropic foundations’ identity and accountability.

Voluntary Sector Review
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sensemaking in philanthropic foundations: developing a taxonomy and typology to understand identity and accountability — Alexandra Williamson, Belinda Luke · Voluntary Sector Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS