Spaces of influence in decentralised governance systems: a comparison of substate civil society networks and politics in the United Kingdom and Canada

Here we explore three case studies, Wales, Quebec and Manitoba, to examine how changes in multilevel governance affect the strategies and the operating environment of civil society organisations (CSO).1 Every multilevel system of governance has considered ways to share political responsibility for social service delivery, vertically between levels of government and horizontally with non-state organisations. Wales, Quebec and Manitoba all have subnational authority over social policy as a result of devolution (United Kingdom) and constitutional arrangements (Canada). Comparing their experiences suggests shifts in the locus of governance that disrupt established patterns and create opportunities for the redesign of governance arrangements. New dynamics are contingent upon the way that CSOs navigate new structures to position themselves in the policy arena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voluntary Sector Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2025d000000042
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spaces of influence in decentralised governance systems: a comparison of substate civil society networks and politics in the United Kingdom and Canada

Sid Frankel, Deena White, Karine Levasseur, Rachel Laforest et al.
Voluntary Sector Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Spaces of influence in decentralised governance systems: a comparison of substate civil society networks and politics in the United Kingdom and Canada

Sid Frankel, Deena White, Karine Levasseur, Rachel Laforest, Sioned Pearce, Christala Sophocleous
article en

Abstract

Here we explore three case studies, Wales, Quebec and Manitoba, to examine how changes in multilevel governance affect the strategies and the operating environment of civil society organisations (CSO).1 Every multilevel system of governance has considered ways to share political responsibility for social service delivery, vertically between levels of government and horizontally with non-state organisations. Wales, Quebec and Manitoba all have subnational authority over social policy as a result of devolution (United Kingdom) and constitutional arrangements (Canada). Comparing their experiences suggests shifts in the locus of governance that disrupt established patterns and create opportunities for the redesign of governance arrangements. New dynamics are contingent upon the way that CSOs navigate new structures to position themselves in the policy arena.

Voluntary Sector Review
Queen's University (CA), Swansea University (GB), University of Manitoba (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), Cardiff University (GB)
Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research and Data
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spaces of influence in decentralised governance systems: a comparison of substate civil society networks and politics in the United Kingdom and Canada — Sid Frankel, Deena White, et al. · Voluntary Sector Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS